Patterns of Error in Interpretive Pathology.

Objectives: To demonstrate how the educational presentation and targeted review of cases with discrepant interpretive findings between pathologists can raise awareness for specific diagnostic errors through identification of common overarching patterns of error in interpretive pathology.

Methods: We performed a review of 147 surgical pathology and cytopathology cases of discordances from 23 PowerPoint presentations presented between 2010 and 2017. Pathologists and pathology residents, blinded from the official interpretations, were presented each case and surveyed for their own diagnostic assessments. Survey results were compared with the final/correct interpretations of the signing pathologists.

Results: Of the 134 cases with available survey results, there were 87 (64.9%) for which most survey respondents proposed a diagnostic interpretation concordant with the final/correct diagnosis. There were 37 (27.6%) cases for which most survey responses were either wholly or partially discordant with the final/correct diagnosis. For 10 (7.5%) cases, there were equal numbers of concordant and discordant survey responses.

Conclusions: Our analyses of the cases with frequent erroneous diagnoses reveal common patterns of error that are widely applicable and outline specific error-prone interpretive tendencies. Greater awareness for these tendencies, highlighted by presentation of discordant cases, can improve the quality of diagnostic pathology services.