COVID-19 has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, globally. Whether COVID-19-related mortality is increased in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRDs) is still debatable. Although results are somewhat conflicting, there are a handful of nationwide studies published indicating that, in individuals with SRD, there is signal for increased adverse COVID-19-related outcomes and higher mortality. It appears that there are differences in COVID-19-related mortality across various SRDs. Besides, certain disease-specific (disease activity, disease duration, medication received) and/or other features (e.g. comorbidities) seem to also affect COVID-19-related mortality in SRD patients. Herein, we wanted to highlight that a more individualized approach taking into consideration the effect of the aforementioned factors into the risk calculation for COVID-19 adverse outcomes, including mortality, in SRD patients is warranted. A multinational study based on nationwide data, examining all common SRDs and stratifying accordingly, would be of interest, toward this direction. Key Points • It is still debatable whether Covid-19-related mortality is increased in patients with sytemic rheumatic diseases (SRD). • Disease-specific risk factors (e.g. type of SRD, disease activity) should be taken into account in risk assessment for Covid-19-releted outcomes in SRD patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9058744 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06190-3 | DOI Listing |
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep
September 2024
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of short- and long-term mortality associated with lung transplantation. The impact of pretransplantation blood transfusions for recipients is not fully elucidated.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of 206 consecutive lung transplantations performed at a single academic center (Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL) from January 2018 to July 2022.
J Emerg Manag
January 2025
Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Background: To determine the impacts of statewide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related public health and social measures (PHSMs) and attempted pandemic mitigation measures on years of potential life lost (YPLL).
Methods: The "openness score" of each state during the COVID-19 pandemic was obtained using two open-source sites, the Multistate openness score and the Wallethub openness score. These scores combined various PHSMs, such as restrictions on gatherings and closing various types of businesses.
Crit Care Sci
January 2025
Intensive Care Department, Hospital Privado de Comunidad - Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the awake-prone position on relevant clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure requiring high-flow nasal oxygen between different waves in Argentina.
Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included adult patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure requiring high-flow nasal oxygen. The main exposure position was the awake-prone position (≥ 6 hours/day) compared to the non-prone position.
Biomedicines
December 2024
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Rescue Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University in Zielona Góra, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland.
SARS-CoV-2 was responsible for the global pandemic. Approximately 10-15% of patients with COVID-19 developed respiratory failure with adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which required treatment in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The cytokine storm observed in severe COVID-19 was frequently handled with steroids.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEClinicalMedicine
August 2024
Section Health Equity Studies & Migration, Department of Primary Care and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Background: Evidence amounted early that migrants, who are often side-lined in pandemic response or preparedness plans, are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences. However, synthesised evidence that quantifies the magnitude of inequalities in infection risk, disease outcomes, consequences of pandemic measures or that explains the underlying mechanisms is lacking.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching 25 databases and grey literature (12/2019 to 09/2023) and considered empirical articles covering migrants, refugees, asylum-seekers, and internally displaced persons reporting COVID-19 cases, hospitalisation, ICU admission, mortality, COVID-19 vaccination rates or health consequences of pandemic measures.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!