UV/peroxydisulfate (PDS) and UV/hydrogen peroxide (HO) can effectively degrade halophenols (HPs, , 2,4-bromophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol); meanwhile, information about the discrepancies in the related degradation kinetics and mechanisms of these two processes is limited. To gain this knowledge, the degradation of two typical HPs (, bromophenols and chlorophenols) in UV/PDS and UV/HO processes were investigated and compared. The results showed that the degradation rates of HPs with different substitution positions in the UV/PDS process were in the order of -substituted HPs (, 4-BP and 4-CP) > -substituted HPs (, 2-BP and 2-CP) > -substituted HPs (, 3-BP and 3-CP), while in the UV/HO process, these rates were in the order of -substituted HPs > -substituted HPs > -substituted HPs. These discrepancies were ascribed to the different reaction activities of SO˙ and HO˙ with HPs, which were calculated based on the competition method. Further density functional theory (DFT) calculations suggested that SO˙ reacts more readily with HPs electron transfer than HO˙. In the presence of water matrices (such as Cl, HCO and natural organic matter (NOM)), the degradation of 2-BP in both UV/PDS and UV/HO treatment processes was inhibited due to the scavenging of free radicals by these background substances. The degradation products and pathways further confirmed that SO˙ is a strong one-electron oxidant that reacts with HPs mainly electron transfer, while HO˙ reacts with HPs electron transfer and hydroxyl addition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9049674 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ra10401a | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!