A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Analytical and clinical validation of dried blood spot and volumetric absorptive microsampling for measurement of tacrolimus and creatinine after renal transplantation. | LitMetric

Background: Serial monitoring of tacrolimus and serum creatinine after renal transplantation is of vital importance. In this study, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the estimation of tacrolimus and creatinine, obtained from dried blood spots (DBS) or by volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) was validated and the two sampling strategies were compared with traditional venous sampling.

Methods: The LC-MS/MS assay was validated using a shared extract for the estimation of tacrolimus and creatinine from DBS and VAMS independently. The relationship between the concentrations in DBS/VAMS specimens and in venous samples was assessed using Passing-Bablok (PB) analysis and the bias between the two methods was determined by the Bland Altman (BA) analysis.

Results: The imprecision and bias of tacrolimus and creatinine estimated from DBS and VAMS samples was <12% and was independent of the hematocrit (Hct). Samples were stable for five days at ambient temperature. From the PB regression analysis, correction equations were generated for the prediction of tacrolimus and creatinine values from DBS and VAMS samples. In a separate cohort of patients for validation, the corrected DBS and VAMS concentrations had a mean (95% CI) bias for tacrolimus of -0.64 (-2.98 to 1.70)% and -0.92 (-3.69 to 1.85)% respectively and for creatinine of 1.00 (-2.73 to 4.72)% and -0.71 (-3.74 to 2.32)% respectively. Using DBS and VAMS respectively, for tacrolimus, 91.8 and 89.8% of patient values and for creatinine, 69.4 and 81.6% of patient values were within the limits of clinical acceptance (within 15% agreement against the venous samples).

Conclusion: We conclude that VAMS is the preferred single sampling option for estimating tacrolimus and creatinine in renal transplant patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.04.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tacrolimus creatinine
16
dried blood
8
volumetric absorptive
8
absorptive microsampling
8
creatinine renal
8
renal transplantation
8
lc-ms/ms assay
8
estimation tacrolimus
8
dbs vams
8
tacrolimus
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!