Evaluation of aortic tortuosity as a negative predictor of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.

Objective: The maximal aortic diameter has been used as a key indication for whether to repair abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Aortic tortuosity has been proposed as another factor to consider. In the present study, we compared the degree of aortic tortuosity in ruptured AAAs with that of unruptured AAAs using computed tomography.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who had undergone AAA repair from December 2014 to December 2019. Patients with a ruptured aneurysm (rAAA) were matched with patients with a nonruptured AAA (nrAAA) with the same maximal aneurysm diameter and age. The degree of aortic tortuosity, defined as the maximum lateral deviation from the aortic centerline, was measured on preoperative coronal computed tomography scans.

Results: During a 5-year period, 572 AAA cases were identified. The aortic tortuosity of the 25 rAAA cases was compared with that of a matched control group of 31 nrAAAs, selected by the same mean maximum diameter of 8.4 cm and similar patient age. In the rAAA group, the mean age was 74.8 years (84% men). In the nrAAA group, the mean age was 76.3 years (88% men). The mean aortic tortuosity for the rAAA and nrAAA groups was 9.3 ± 7.9 mm and 18.0 ± 11.2 mm, respectively (P < .01).

Conclusions: Greater aortic tortuosity was seen in the nrAAA cases compared with the rAAA cases at the same matched aneurysm size. Thus, aortic tortuosity might confer a reduced rupture risk. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to verify this observation.