Objectives: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) analysis is performed routinely for aneuploidy screening, RhD genotyping or sex determination. Although applications to single gene disorders (SGD) are being rapidly developed worldwide, only a few laboratories offer cffDNA testing routinely as a diagnosis service for this indication. In a previous report, we described a standardised protocol for non-invasive exclusion of paternal variant in SGD. Three years later, we now report our clinical experience with the protocol.

Design: Descriptive study.

Setting: Multi-centre French.

Population: Indications for referral included pregnancies at risk of 25% or 50% of paternally inherited SGD, and pregnancies associated with an increased risk of SGD due to a de novo variant, either from strongly suggestive ultrasound findings or from a possible parental germinal mosaicism in the context of a previously affected child.

Methods: Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis was performed using custom assays for droplet digital PCR. Feasibility, diagnostic performance and turn-around time were evaluated.

Results: Mean time for a new assay design and validation was evaluated at 14 days, and mean result reporting time was 6 days. All referred pathogenic variants could be targeted except one located in a complex genomic region. A result was obtained for every 198 referrals except two.

Conclusion: This service was successfully implemented as a routine laboratory practice. It has been widely adopted by French clinicians and patients for paternal variant exclusion in various disorders.

Tweetable Abstract: A robust approach to non-invasive prenatal exclusion of paternal pathogenic variant in a diagnosis setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17201DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-invasive prenatal
12
prenatal diagnosis
8
single gene
8
gene disorders
8
clinical experience
8
exclusion paternal
8
paternal variant
8
non-invasive
4
diagnosis
4
diagnosis single
4

Similar Publications

Australian Preferences for Prenatal Screening: A Discrete Choice Experiment Comparing Metropolitan and Rural/Regional Areas.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy

January 2025

Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing has the potential to be a useful genetic screening tool in Australia. However, concerns have been raised about its cost, commercial provision, the psychological impacts of the screening process, and disparities in access experienced by rural and regional communities.

Aims: The aims of this study are (1) to estimate Australian preferences for features of prenatal screening; (2) to explore potential variations in preferences between metropolitan and rural/regional communities; (3) to estimate the extent to which respondents are willing to trade-off between attributes, using willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to wait estimates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Overweight and obesity are global issues, especially among women of childbearing age, linked to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. These risks vary by age, race, and ethnicity, with increasing rates among immigrant and minority women. This study compares overweight and obesity rates, pregnancy weight gain, and neonatal outcomes in Turkish and Syrian immigrant/refugee women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rising globally, particularly among children exposed to adverse intrauterine environments, such as those associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Epigenetic modifications, specifically DNA methylation, have emerged as mechanisms by which early environmental exposures can predispose offspring to metabolic diseases. This study aimed to investigate DNA methylation differences in children born to mothers with GDM compared to non-GDM mothers, using saliva samples, and to assess the association of these epigenetic patterns with early growth measurements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) does not receive any Medicare rebate. This study investigated the views of Australian healthcare providers and consumers on public funding of NIPT.

Materials And Methods: Two anonymous online, cross-sectional surveys were conducted from September 2022 to January 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!