AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the prevalence of PTSD and adjustment disorder (AD) among 5,913 adults during the early COVID-19 pandemic, revealing that while many met the criteria for mental health disorders, only a small percentage were classified as having PTSD.
  • Findings indicated that 61.7% of participants showed significant symptoms, but only 6.7% had PTSD when considering life-threatening circumstances, with the majority (55%) being classified with AD.
  • Three distinct profiles of AD emerged, characterized by intense fear without life-threat, feelings of sadness or grief, and significant worry about loved ones' safety.

Article Abstract

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been hailed by some as the emblematic mental disorder of the COVID-19 pandemic, assuming that PTSD's life-threat criterion was met de facto. More plausible outcomes like adjustment disorder (AD) have been overlooked.

Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was launched in the initial stage of the pandemic using a convenience sample of 5 913 adults to compare the prevalence of COVID-related probable PTSD versus probable AD. The abridged Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-6) assessed the severity of trauma- and stressor-related symptoms over the previous week. Demographic and pandemic-related data (e.g., receiving a formal diagnosis of COVID-19, job loss, loss of loved one, confinement, material hardship) were collected. A Classification and Regression Tree analysis was conducted to uncover the pandemic experiences leading to clinical 'caseness'. Caseness was defined by a score > 9 on the IES-6 symptom measure and further characterized as PTSD or AD depending on whether the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory's life-threat item was endorsed or not.

Results: The participants were predominantly Caucasian (72.8%), women (79.2%), with a university degree (85%), and a mean age of 42.22 (SD = 15.24) years; 3 647 participants (61.7%; 95%CI [60.4, 63.0]) met the threshold for caseness. However, when perceived life-threat was accounted for, only 6.7% (95%CI [6.1, 7.4]) were classified as PTSD cases, and 55% (95%CI [53.7, 56.2]) as AD cases. Among the AD cases, three distinct profiles emerged marked by the following: (i) a worst personal pandemic experience eliciting intense fear, helplessness or horror (in the absence, however, of any life-threat), (ii) a pandemic experience eliciting sadness/grief, and (iii) worrying intensely about the safety of significant others.

Conclusions: Studies considering the life-threat criterion as met de facto during the pandemic are confusing PTSD for AD on most counts. This misconception is obscuring the various AD-related idioms of distress that have emerged during the pandemic and the actual treatment needs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9047380PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03903-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disorder covid-19
8
pandemic
8
covid-19 pandemic
8
adjustment disorder
8
life-threat criterion
8
criterion met
8
met facto
8
pandemic experience
8
experience eliciting
8
ptsd
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!