Objective: The purpose of this study was to transition from a traditional score-based peer-review system to an education-oriented peer-learning program in our academic abdominal radiology practice.

Material And Methods: This retrospective study compared our experience with a score-based peer-review model used prior to September 2020 and a peer-learning model implemented and used exclusively beginning in October of 2020. In peer review, a web-based peer-review tool randomly generated a list of cases, which were blindly reviewed in consensus. Comparison of the consensus interpretation with the original report was used to categorize each reviewed case and to calculate the rates of significant and minor discrepancies. Only cases with a discrepancy were considered to represent a learning opportunity. In peer learning, faculty prospectively identified and submitted cases for review in several categories, including case interpretations with a discrepancy from subsequent opinion or result, interpretations considered to represent a great call, and interesting or challenging cases meriting further discussion. The peer-learning coordinator showed each case to the group in a manner which blinded the group to both submitting and interpreting radiologist and invited discussion during various stages of the case.

Results: During peer review, a total of 172 cases were reviewed over 16 sessions occurring between April 2016 and September 2020. Only 3 cases (1.8%) yielded significant discrepancies whereas 13 (7.6%) yielded minor discrepancies, representing a total of 16 learning opportunities (3.6 per year). In peer learning, 64 cases were submitted and 52 reviewed over 7 sessions occurring between October 2020 and October 2021. 29 (56%) were submitted as an interesting or challenging case meriting further discussion, 18 (35%) were submitted for a discrepancy, and 5 (10%) were submitted for a great call. All 52 presented cases represented learning opportunities (48 per year).

Conclusion: An education-focused peer-learning program provided a platform for continuous quality improvement and yielded substantially more learning opportunities compared to score-based peer review.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03523-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer-learning program
12
peer review
12
learning opportunities
12
program academic
8
academic abdominal
8
abdominal radiology
8
peer-review system
8
score-based peer-review
8
september 2020
8
october 2020
8

Similar Publications

Mixed discipline 'Simulation Integrating Metal and Physical health Learning' (SMIPL): A qualitative study of student experience and learning.

Nurse Educ Today

January 2025

Lecturer in Nursing Education, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA. Electronic address:

Background/problems: Individuals with comorbid physical and mental health conditions face significant threats to their well-being while placing a substantial burden on healthcare systems through increased service costs. Nursing professionals encounter multiple challenges in delivering effective care to this population. These challenges include a lack of integrated care models, communication barriers among providers, the complexity of addressing dual health needs, insufficient training in comorbidity management, resource and time constraints, and pervasive stigma toward mental illness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Instilling the principles of ethical and responsible medical research is critical for educating the next generation of clinical researchers. We developed a responsible conduct of research (RCR) workshop and associated curriculum for undergraduate trainees in a quantitative clinical research program.

Methods: Topics in this 7-module RCR workshop are relevant to undergraduate trainees in quantitative fields, many of whom are learning about these concepts for the first time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Access to clean and efficient cooking fuel is crucial for promoting good health, safeguarding the environment, and driving economic growth. Despite efforts to promote the adoption of cleaner alternatives, traditional solid fuels such as charcoal and firewood remain prevalent in Ghana. In this study, we utilized a statistical mechanical model as a framework to explore the statistical relationship between socio-economic factors such as educational attainment, wealth status, place of residence, and cooking fuel choices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Self-help groups (SHGs) and Support Groups (SGs) are increasingly recognized as effective mechanisms for improving maternal and young child nutrition due to their decentralized, community-based structures. While numerous studies have evaluated the outcomes and impact of SHGs and SGs on nutrition practices, there remains a gap in the literature. To address this, we conducted a literature review to examine the role of SHGs and SGs in improving health and nutrition outcomes, focusing on marginalized women, especially pregnant and lactating women (PLW), in India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam, with an emphasis on programs supported by the international non-governmental initiative, Alive & Thrive.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!