Determination of the center of mass in a heterogeneous population of dogs.

PLoS One

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.

Published: April 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The center of mass (CoM) is the point in a dog's body where mass is evenly distributed, significantly influencing balance and movement, yet this concept is not well-explored in canine studies.
  • This study aimed to assess the CoM variance in different breeds of client-owned dogs and examine how it relates to their physical dimensions and data from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed on a neck collar.
  • Findings showed that the average CoM could be calculated in three planes (transverse, sagittal, and dorsal) and indicated that dog length is crucial for understanding the relationship between the CoM and other measurable variables, suggesting that normalization methods based on CoM might improve data consistency in future dog studies.

Article Abstract

The center of mass (CoM) is the location in a body where mass distribution is balanced. It has a fundamental role in balance and motion which has been poorly described in the dog. The objective of this study was to estimate the variance of the center of mass (CoM) in a heterogeneous population of client-owned dogs and to describe the relationship between CoM, subject morphometrics and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) box positioned ventrally on a neck collar. A single force platform and a reaction board were used to determine CoM in the transverse, sagittal and dorsal planes in thirty-one healthy adult dogs. A series of morphometric measurements were acquired with each dog standing, including distances relative to an IMU box positioned ventrally on a neck collar. Mean transverse plane CoM was 48% the distance from ischium to the IMU box, near the xiphoid process. Mean sagittal place CoM was 59% the width of the chest on the left side. Mean dorsal plane CoM was 41% the distance from the most dorsal to the most ventral aspect of the body. Dog length was the primary variable required to maximize the relationship between three-dimensional CoM and identifiable variables measured. A CoM based normalization procedure should be considered to normalize mass or motion based outcome measure output (e.g., ground reaction forces, vector acceleration) in a heterogeneous population of dogs. Future research will be needed to determine if CoM-based normalization procedures reduce variance in outcome measures affected by subject morphometrics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9045670PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267361PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

center mass
12
heterogeneous population
12
imu box
12
mass heterogeneous
8
population dogs
8
subject morphometrics
8
box positioned
8
positioned ventrally
8
ventrally neck
8
neck collar
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!