Objectives: To determine the rate of morbidity and assess the oncological outcomes for the subinguinal orchidectomy technique.

Background: Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the definitive management for a testicular mass suspicious for malignancy. The standard approach involves the division of the spermatic cord at the internal inguinal ring. In addition to the morbidity of a significant incision through skin and fascia, a known complication is damage to the nerves within the canal leading to local hypoesthesia or persistent inguinal and scrotal neuralgia. The subinguinal orchiectomy technique avoids opening the inguinal canal by excising the spermatic cord at the external inguinal ring.

Methods: Patient data from three urologists who routinely perform subinguinal orchiectomies for suspected testicular malignancy was collected. A retrospective analysis between March 2011 and March 2019 was undertaken evaluating demographic, clinical, and histological data points. Descriptive analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of subinguinal orchiectomy for testicular mass was performed. Descriptive analysis of oncological and surgical outcomes of subinguinal orchiectomy for testicular mass was performed.

Results: About 42 orchiectomies performed via the subinguinal approach were identified. The median age was 38 years (range 22-72) and mean follow-up time was 18.4 months (range 0.59-61). Of the 38 patients with testicular cancer, histopathology showed 26 with pT1, 9 with pT2, and 3 with pT3 disease. Three patients had involvement of the cord, with one patient having a positive surgical margin secondary to venous invasion. No patients experienced neuropathic complications, hernia, or wound break down.

Conclusion: These data suggest that subinguinal orchiectomy provides acceptable oncological outcomes, comparable to a traditional technique, and may decrease the risk of neuropathic injury and incisional/inguinal hernia. Further investigation with a larger, prospective series is required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988733PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.33DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subinguinal orchiectomy
16
outcomes subinguinal
12
testicular mass
12
subinguinal
8
oncological outcomes
8
spermatic cord
8
descriptive analysis
8
analysis oncological
8
oncological surgical
8
surgical outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: We aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes following inguinal and subinguinal urologic procedures under deep intravenous sedation (DIVS) with multimodal local anesthesia (LA).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from September 2022 to December 2023 including adult patients deemed eligible for day surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologist score 1-3) undergoing radical orchiectomy (RO), microscopic varicocelectomy (MV), or microscopic denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC). All procedures were performed at a single urologic ambulatory surgical center and outpatient clinic, and by a single surgeon (PP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tips and Tricks: Evolution of Orchidectomy.

Eur Urol Focus

May 2024

Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address:

Radical orchidectomy has been the standard surgery for testicular tumours. While a straightforward routine surgery, there are several finer points in the surgical technique and perioperative care that urologists should be familiar with. This mini-review discusses modifications to the conventional surgical approach such as organ-sparing surgery and the subinguinal approach, and practice points regarding prostheses and sperm banking that are pertinent to early management of a patient with a testicular tumour.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The management of chronic scrotal pain is long and varied, with historical treatment algorithms typically ending with orchiectomy. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC) is a testicle-sparing option for patients who have failed conservative treatment options and over its forty-year history has seen many technical refinements.

Objectives: To review the history and development of MDSC and discuss the outcomes of different surgical techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The management of chronic scrotal pain is long and varied, with historical treatment algorithms typically ending with orchiectomy. Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord (MDSC) is a testicle-sparing option for patients who have failed conservative treatment options and over its forty-year history has seen many technical refinements.

Objectives: To review the history and development of MDSC and discuss the outcomes of different surgical techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To determine the rate of morbidity and assess the oncological outcomes for the subinguinal orchidectomy technique.

Background: Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the definitive management for a testicular mass suspicious for malignancy. The standard approach involves the division of the spermatic cord at the internal inguinal ring.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!