Clinical Yield of Electromagnetic Source Imaging and Hemodynamic Responses in Epilepsy: Validation With Intracerebral Data.

Background And Objectives: Accurate delineation of the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) in focal drug-resistant epilepsy often requires stereo-EEG (SEEG) recordings. Our aims were to propose a truly objective and quantitative comparison between EEG/magnetoencephalography (MEG) source imaging (EMSI), EEG/fMRI responses for similar spikes with primary irritative zone (PIZ) and SOZ defined by SEEG and to evaluate the value of EMSI and EEG/fMRI to predict postsurgical outcome.

Methods: We identified patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent EEG/MEG, EEG/fMRI, and subsequent SEEG at the Epilepsy Service from the Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital. We quantified multimodal concordance within the SEEG channel space as spatial overlap with PIZ/SOZ and distances to the spike-onset, spike maximum amplitude and seizure core intracerebral channels by applying a new methodology consisting of converting EMSI results into SEEG electrical potentials (EMSIe-SEEG) and projecting the most significant fMRI response on the SEEG channels (fMRIp-SEEG). Spatial overlaps with PIZ/SOZ (AUC, AUC) were assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Here, AUC represents the probability that a randomly picked active contact exhibited higher amplitude when located inside the spatial reference than outside.

Results: Seventeen patients were included. Mean spatial overlaps with the PIZ and SOZ were 0.71 and 0.65 for EMSIe-SEEG and 0.57 and 0.62 for fMRIp-SEEG. Good EMSIe-SEEG spatial overlap with the PIZ was associated with smaller distance from the maximum EMSIe-SEEG contact to the spike maximum amplitude channel (median distance 14 mm). Conversely, good fMRIp-SEEG spatial overlap with the SOZ was associated with smaller distances from the maximum fMRIp-SEEG contact to the spike-onset and seizure core channels (median distances 10 and 5 mm, respectively). Surgical outcomes were correctly predicted by EEG/MEG in 12 of 15 (80%) patients and EEG/fMRI in 6 of 11(54%) patients.

Discussion: With the use of a unique quantitative approach estimating EMSI and fMRI results in the reference SEEG channel space, EEG/MEG and EEG/fMRI accurately localized the SOZ and the PIZ. Precisely, EEG/MEG more accurately localized the PIZ, whereas EEG/fMRI was more sensitive to the SOZ. Both neuroimaging techniques provide complementary localization that can help guide SEEG implantation and select good candidates for surgery.