A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison and evaluation of analytic and diagnostic performances of four commercial kits for the detection of antibodies against Echinococcus granulosus and multilocularis in human sera. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a disease caused by the Echinococcus granulosus parasite, affecting both humans and animals globally; diagnosis typically involves imaging and immunoassays.
  • A study evaluated four commercial diagnostic kits for detecting IgG antibodies against E. granulosus and E. multilocularis using 259 serum samples.
  • All four tests showed strong reliability and quality, with immunoblotting (IB) being the most dependable, followed by immunochromatographic tests (ICT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs).

Article Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato (s.l.), an ubiquitous worldwide zoonotic agent affecting humans and animals. Diagnosis of CE in humans is usually performed by imagine techniques along with immunoassays. The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare four commercial diagnostic kits, based on the detection of IgG antibodies against E. granulosus and E. multilocularis. The study was performed on a total of 259 sera: the positive (n = 74) and the negative (n = 185) group. The following analytic and diagnostic performances of the four kits were evaluated: operator skills, specificity, sensitivity, repeatability, reproducibility, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values. Based on the parameters evaluated, all four tests demonstrated excellent quality and proved to be reliable diagnostic tools to support the clinical evaluation of human patients suspected of having CE. The four commercial assays, in our hands, presented altogether, a range of performances from good to excellent, being immunoblotting (IB) the most reliable, used as gold standard, followed by the immunochromatographic test (ICT) and finally the two enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101816DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

analytic diagnostic
8
diagnostic performances
8
echinococcus granulosus
8
granulosus multilocularis
8
comparison evaluation
4
evaluation analytic
4
diagnostic
4
performances commercial
4
commercial kits
4
kits detection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!