AI Article Synopsis

  • Despite the general success of total hip arthroplasty (THA), some patients, particularly younger and more active ones, are concerned about the added weight of implants, which the study aimed to address.
  • The research involved 104 patients and found that both cementless and cemented THA implants were significantly heavier than the tissue and bone removed during surgery, with a median weight gain of 145g and 241g respectively.
  • Factors such as lower BMI, gender, and implant type influenced weight gain, with women and patients receiving cemented stems experiencing more significant increases; however, the long-term impact of this weight gain remains unclear.

Article Abstract

Background: While total hip arthroplasty (THA) is generally very successful, certain patients remain dissatisfied. A common concern, especially in younger and more active patients, is the weight the implant will add to the hip. However, there is very little data available to help guide surgeons in addressing this concern. The goal of this study was therefore to compare the weight of the total hip arthroplasty implants to that of tissue removed.

Hypothesis: That the weight of the total hip arthroplasty implants would exceed that removed tissue.

Patients And Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 104 patients, without interfering with surgical plans. To account for different implant designs, especially relating to stem fixation, we included both cementless (n=51) and cemented (n=53) femoral stems. During the procedure, the removed bone and soft tissues, as well as the post-implantation cement were collected and weighed. The weight of the implants was provided by the manufacturer.

Results: Both cemented and cementless THA implants proved significantly heavier than the removed bone and soft tissues. The median weight gained was 145g [IQR: 123-168] with the cementless implant and 241g [221-364] with the cemented implant (p<0.001). Multivariable regression analysis of patient- or implant factors influencing weight gain after THA revealed that weight gain decreased with patient BMI (β=-1.0, 95% CI: -2.0--0.1 (p=0.034)). In contrast, weight gain increased slightly with total implant weight (β=0.7, 95% CI: 0.6-0.8 (p≤0.001)). Further, weight gain was greater for women (β=19.0, 95% CI: 9.1-29.0 (p≤0.001) (men 150g [135-219], women 211g [157-250] (p=0.010)) and patients who received the cemented stem (β=40.0, 95% CI, 19.4-46.5, p≤0.001).

Discussion: Current models cause a two- to three-fold gain of weight at the hip joint after THA. While it is not clear whether this weight increase has any clinical repercussions, this finding can be helpful when a patient raises questions on this topic during the preoperative counseling. More research is necessary to determine whether lighter implants may be beneficial for patients.

Level Of Evidence: III, case control study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103298DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hip arthroplasty
16
total hip
12
weight total
8
arthroplasty implants
8
removed bone
8
bone soft
8
soft tissues
8
hip
5
weight
5
doctor ceramic-on-ceramic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!