Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. In Indonesia, cervical cancer is the second most frequent disease related to cancer. Based on staging system criteria, clinical findings are the main criteria to determine cervical cancer stage. In the revised version of the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system criteria for cervical cancer, radiological examination for pretreatment evaluation in gynecological malignancies has been used in routine modalities. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG) are commonly used in the presurgery determination of tumor size and the follow-up of cervical cancer patients. Tumor size determines cancer stage which influences the treatment and the survival. The equality of diagnostic accuracy was compared for MRI and ultrasound in this study for tumor size evaluation of cervical cancer patients.

Methods: This was a prospective study including 195 patients with cervical cancer Stage IIIB in Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from 2016 to 2018. The tumor sizes and stages of cervical cancer were assessed on MRI and ultrasound. This study evaluated diagnostic accuracy between MRI and US. The sensitivity and specificity were compared by using McNemar test.

Results: The result of the study showed that from 195 patients, 76 patients fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. There is a significant difference in assessing tumor size in cervical cancer patients between ultrasound and MRI (mean, 1.72 cm; < 0.0001). US had 82% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 82% diagnostic accuracy ( = 0.003, McNemar test).

Conclusion: Ultrasound examination showed a comparable accuracy to MRI for assessing tumor size in cervical cancer. US is an affordable and feasible diagnostic staging tool with accuracy comparable to MRI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9030351PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JMU.JMU_2_21DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical cancer
44
tumor size
24
cancer
14
cancer patients
12
cancer stage
12
diagnostic accuracy
12
cervical
11
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
size evaluation
8

Similar Publications

Despite being designated as "noncarcinogenic" human papillomavirus (HPV) types, mono-infection with HPV6 or HPV11 has been found in squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) at specific sites, including the larynx, penis, anus, and rarely, the lower female genital tract. The association between clinicopathologic features, viral status, and the carcinogenic mechanisms related to these low-risk HPVs remains unclear. The current study characterizes a series of low-risk HPV6 and HPV11-associated SCCs of the uterine cervix (6 cases) and vulva (2 cases).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as pembrolizumab, have revolutionized cancer therapy but can lead to severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We present a case of fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and mesenteric ischemia in a 78-year-old woman with recurrent stage IIIC1 cervical cancer treated with pembrolizumab. Thirty-four days after initiating a pembrolizumab-containing regimen, she presented with vomiting, severe hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, and strongly positive urine ketones.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to provide evidence to improve cervical screening for women living with HIV (WLHIV). We assessed the accuracy of screening tests that can be used in low-resource settings and give results at the same visit.

Methods And Analysis: We conducted a paired, prospective study among consecutive eligible WLHIV, aged 18-65 years, receiving cervical cancer screening at one hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The authors determined whether certain subgroups of patients with cancer on Ohio Medicaid benefited from the program's expansion to a greater/lesser extent. Study outcomes included stage at diagnosis for screening-amenable cancers (breast [=1,707 and 2,976], cervical [=309 and 655], and colorectal [=927 and 2,009] cancer, before and after expansion, respectively) and time to treatment initiation.

Methods: Using linked data from the 2011-2017 Ohio cancer registry and Medicaid, the authors conducted a robust Poisson regression analysis for stage at diagnosis and Cox regression analysis for time to treatment initiation to obtain the adjusted risk for earlier stage at diagnosis before to after expansion or hazard of shorter time to treatment initiation for each demographic or clinical subgroup after compared with before pre-Medicaid expansion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!