Medical error is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in the health care system. Considering the significance of medical error management in the healthcare system, error disclosure is an imperative moral responsibility of medical and healthcare professionals from medical ethics experts' perspective. In literature, no or inadequate protocols were suggested for disclosing colleague's medical error; and hence, this study was conducted to provide two algorithms for colleague's medical error disclosure at individual and organizational levels. This study conducted a narrative review on several valid Internet databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. First, the literature on the colleague's error was reviewed using articles of the last 20 years focusing on medical errors and error disclosure keywords. Next, two algorithms were developed for the colleague's error disclosure for individuals and with the assistance of organizations, respectively. If we personally notice a colleague's error at an individual level, we should plan for a conversation to encourage the colleague to inform the patient or the related organization about the error. If we notice a medical error from a colleague relating to an organization, we should decide based on circumstances considering the organization's responsible parties for handling error disclosure. This study proposes a simple protocol for detecting peer error at the individual level and at the organizational level, using the existing literature. However, the improvement of these types of methods requires analysis of the specific conditions of each health system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8985624PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.35.163DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

error disclosure
24
medical error
24
error
15
colleague's medical
12
error individual
12
colleague's error
12
medical
9
individual organizational
8
organizational levels
8
study conducted
8

Similar Publications

Objective: This study investigates the refractive accuracy of eight intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in patients with postoperative refractive surprise after phacoemulsification. It aims to determine if a different formula could result in better refractive outcomes in these eyes.

Methods And Analysis: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification as a sole procedure between March 2007 and September 2020 at the University of Washington by glaucoma subspecialists as part of a study investigating cataract surgery in normal eyes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To compare menopausal symptoms between tamoxifen alone and tamoxifen with ovarian function suppression (OFS) over 12 months, identifying related factors.

Methods: This prospective, observational study included 209 premenopausal patients with breast cancer on tamoxifen, recruited from Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea. We collected demographic and clinical information from the participants' medical records and assessed menopausal symptoms using the Korean Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 3-, 6-, and 12-months postdiagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Sigma metrics, a cornerstone of quality control (QC) in manufacturing, have been increasingly adopted in analytical processes. In clinical biochemistry labs, Sigma analysis provides insights into the level of QC achieved and identifies deviations from perfection. Methods A prospective-retrospective observational study was conducted at the Central Diagnostic Laboratory of Shree Krishna Hospital between August 2021 and July 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There is no standardization within hand and upper-extremity surgery regarding which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are collected and reported. This limits the ability to compare or combine cohorts that utilize different PROMs. The aim of this study was to develop a linkage model for the QuickDASH (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and PROMIS PF CAT (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function computerized adaptive testing) instruments to allow interconversion between these PROMs in a hand surgery population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!