A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cognitive and behavioural bias in advance care planning. | LitMetric

Cognitive and behavioural bias in advance care planning.

Palliat Care Soc Pract

School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Published: April 2022

Background: We explore cognitive and behavioural biases that influence individual's willingness to engage advance care planning (ACP). Because contexts for the initiation of ACP discussions can be so different, our objective in this study was to identify specific groups, particular preferences or uniform behaviours, that may be prone to cognitive bias in the ACP decision process.

Method: We collected data from the Australian general public ( = 1253), as well as general practitioners (GPs) and nurses ( = 117) including demographics, stated preference for ACP decision-making; six cognitive bias tests commonly used in Behavioural Economics; and a framing experiment in the context of ACP.

Results: Compared to GPs ( = 57.6 years, SD = 17.2) and the general public (58.1 years, SD = 14.56), nurses on average recommend ACP discussions with patients occur approximately 15 years earlier ( = 42.9 years, SD = 23.1;  < 0.0001 in both cases). There is a positive correlation between the age of the general population and the preferred age for the initial ACP discussion ( = 0.368,  < 0.001). Our shared decision-making analysis shows the mean share of doctor's ACP input is viewed to be approximately 40% by the general public, significantly higher than health professionals (GPs and nurses), who believe doctors should only contribute approximately 20% input. The general public show varying relationships (all  < 0.05) for both first ACP discussion, and shared decision-making for five of six cognitive tests. However, for health professionals, only those who exhibit confirmation bias show differences (8.4% higher;  = 0.035) of patient's input. Our framing experiment results show that positive negative framing can result in as much as 4.9-7.0% shift in preference for factors most relevant to ACP uptake.

Conclusion: Understanding how GPs, nurses and patients perceive, engage and choose to communicate ACP and how specific groups, particular preferences or uniform behaviours, may be prone to cognitive bias in the decision process is of critical importance for increasing future uptake and efficient future healthcare provision.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9021513PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524221092458DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cognitive behavioural
8
advance care
8
care planning
8
acp discussions
8
cognitive bias
8
general public
8
acp
5
cognitive
4
behavioural bias
4
bias advance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!