Marking 2-Years of New Thinking in Clinical Trials: The Estimand Journey.

Ther Innov Regul Sci

Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Medical Writing, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Published: July 2022

The ICH E9(R1) addendum on Estimands and Sensitivity Analyses in Clinical Trials has introduced a new estimand framework for the design, conduct, analysis, and interpretation of clinical trials. We share Pharmaceutical Industry experiences of implementing the estimand framework in the first two years since the final guidance became available with key lessons learned and highlight what else needs to be done to continue the journey in embedding the estimand framework in clinical trials. Emerging best practices and points to consider on strategies for implementing a new estimand thinking process are provided. Whilst much of the focus of implementing ICH E9(R1) to date has been on defining estimands, we highlight some of the important aspects relating to the choice of statistical analysis methods and sensitivity analyses to ensure estimands can be estimated robustly with minimal bias. In particular, we discuss the implications if complete follow-up is not possible when the treatment policy strategy is being used to handle intercurrent events. ICH E9(R1) was introduced just before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, but a positive outcome from the pandemic has been an acceleration in the adoption of the estimand framework, including differentiating intercurrent events related or not related to the pandemic. In summary, much has been learned on the estimand journey and continued sharing of case studies will help to further advance the understanding and increase awareness across all clinical researchers of the estimand framework.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9035309PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-022-00402-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

estimand framework
20
clinical trials
16
ich e9r1
12
estimand
8
estimand journey
8
sensitivity analyses
8
implementing estimand
8
intercurrent events
8
clinical
5
framework
5

Similar Publications

Causal Estimands and Multiply Robust Estimation of Mediated-Moderation.

Multivariate Behav Res

January 2025

Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

When studying effect heterogeneity between different subgroups (i.e., moderation), researchers are frequently interested in the mediation mechanisms underlying the heterogeneity, that is, the mediated moderation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A Bayesian framework for causal analysis of recurrent events with timing misalignment.

Biometrics

October 2024

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, United States.

Observational studies of recurrent event rates are common in biomedical statistics. Broadly, the goal is to estimate differences in event rates under 2 treatments within a defined target population over a specified follow-up window. Estimation with observational data is challenging because, while membership in the target population is defined in terms of eligibility criteria, treatment is rarely observed exactly at the time of eligibility.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Applying the estimand framework to clinical pharmacology trials with a case study in bioequivalence.

Br J Clin Pharmacol

November 2024

Statistical Innovation, Respiratory and Immunology Biometrics and Statistical Innovation, Biopharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use has published an addendum on estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials along with related training materials. These define an estimand as a precise description of the treatment effect that reflects the scientific question of interest. In December 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration released draft guidance recommending estimands of interest be specified in bioequivalence trial protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) play an increasing role in the evaluation of oncology treatments. At the same time, single-arm trials are commonly included in regulatory approval submissions. Because of the high risk of biases, results from single-arm trials require careful interpretation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vaccines are crucial for protecting health globally; however, their widespread use relies on rigorous clinical development programmes. This includes Phase 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to confirm their safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Traditionally, such trials used fixed designs with predetermined assumptions, lacking the flexibility to change during the trial or stop early due to overwhelming evidence of either efficacy or futility.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!