Ankle fractures can cause significant functional impairment in the short and long term. In recent years, gait analysis using inertial sensors has gained special relevance as a reliable measurement system. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in spatiotemporal gait parameters and clinical−functional measurements in patients with bimalleolar ankle fracture and healthy subjects, to study the correlation between the different variables, and to analyze the test−retest reliability of a single inertial sensor in our study population. Twenty-two subjects with bimalleolar ankle fracture six months after surgery and eleven healthy subjects were included in the study. Spatiotemporal parameters were analyzed with the G-WALK sensor. Functional scales and clinical measures were collected beforehand. In the ankle fracture group, the main differences were obtained in bilateral parameters (effect size: 0.61 ≤ d ≤ 0.80). Between-group differences were found in cadence, speed, stride length, and stride time (effect size: 1.61 ≤ d ≤ 1.82). Correlation was moderate (0.436 < r < 0.554) between spatiotemporal parameters and clinical−functional measures, explaining up to 46% of gait performance. Test−retest reliability scores were high to excellent (0.84 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.98), with the worst results in the gait phases. Our study population presents evident clinical−functional impairments 6 months after surgery. The G-WALK can be considered a reliable tool for clinical use in this population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9032166PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22083050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bimalleolar ankle
12
months surgery
12
ankle fracture
12
g-walk sensor
8
subjects bimalleolar
8
ankle fractures
8
parameters clinical−functional
8
healthy subjects
8
test−retest reliability
8
study population
8

Similar Publications

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH ANKLE FRACTURE TREATED IN A TERTIARY LEVEL HOSPITAL.

Acta Ortop Bras

January 2025

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Objective: To evaluate the epidemiological profile of patients diagnosed with ankle fracture admitted to a tertiary hospital.

Methods: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Inclusion Criteria: Individuals aged ≥18 (eighteen) years, diagnosed with ankle fracture, who underwent surgical and/or conservative treatment at a tertiary hospital in the city of São Paulo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Bilateral simultaneous rotational ankle fractures are an unusual phenomenon that remains unreported in the English literature, and to our knowledge, about 10 cases have been reported. The aim of the study was to evaluate and report clinical outcomes of bilateral simultaneous ankle fractures in our institution.

Case Reoprt: We conducted a review of our 2-year experience with patients who had simultaneous bilateral fractures of the ankles and were treated at our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on isolated medial malleolar fractures, which are less common than other types of ankle fractures, and evaluates outcomes of treatment using cross-screw fixation.
  • Thirteen patients were treated and assessed for fracture healing after 3 months and functional recovery using the AOFAS score, showing positive results with an average score of 82 at 3 months and 92.2 at 24 months.
  • Cross-screw fixation is recommended for its benefits, including minimal soft-tissue damage and effective stabilization, making it a suitable option for these types of fractures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Medial malleolus fractures (MMFs) are common across the world. Currently, there is a lack of consensus on the number of screws used in fixation of MMF. Our aim was to compare the radiographic outcomes of MMF with patients between fractures that have either undergone single-screw (SS) or dual-screw (DS) fixation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of elective implant removal and complication rates between mini and small fragment implants for lateral malleolar fixation.

Injury

December 2024

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Regions Hospital, Saint Paul, MN, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the use of mini-fragment implants versus small-fragment implants for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures, aiming to determine if mini-fragments lead to lower rates of elective implant removal and complications.
  • It analyzed data from 505 patients, finding similar rates of elective implant removal (8.3% for mini-fragment vs. 10.8% for small-fragment) and complication rates (6.7% for mini-fragment vs. 6.5% for small-fragment).
  • The authors conclude that while mini-fragment implants are popular, their higher cost must be weighed against their similar effectiveness to small-fragment implants in terms of implant removal and complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!