Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9026414 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040988 | DOI Listing |
Int J Gynecol Cancer
January 2023
The US Oncology Network, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
Background: The impact of blood transfusion on ovarian cancer survival is uncertain.
Objective: To investigate whether peri-operative blood transfusion negatively impacted progression-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Methods: We performed an ancillary analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) 55971 phase III trial, in which patients were randomized to primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Diagnostics (Basel)
April 2022
Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove, PA 19090, USA.
Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Oncol
December 2018
Department of Gynaecological Cancer, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Background: Individual patient data from two randomised trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with upfront debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancer were analysed to examine long-term outcomes for patients and to identify any preferable therapeutic approaches for subgroup populations.
Methods: We did a per-protocol pooled analysis of individual patient data from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 55971 trial (NCT00003636) and the Medical Research Council Chemotherapy Or Upfront Surgery (CHORUS) trial (ISRCTN74802813). In the EORTC trial, eligible women had biopsy-proven International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial tubo-ovarian carcinoma.
Objective: The revised version of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2014) for epithelial ovarian cancer includes a number of changes. One of these is the division of stage IV into 2 subgroups. Data on the prognostic and predictive significance of this classification are scarce.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Gynecol Cancer
March 2014
*Gynecologic Oncology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven; and †Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven; and ‡Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; §Royal United Hospital NHS Trust, Gynaecological Oncology, Bath, United Kingdom; ∥Division of Women and Baby, Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht; and ¶Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center-Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; #Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; **Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom; and ††Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
Objective: Epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are, although still treated as a single disease entity, often classified into type I tumors (low-grade serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell) and type II tumors (high-grade serous, undifferentiated cancers, carcinosarcomas). The aim of our study was to determine the incidence, clinical relevance, and prognostic and predictive impact of somatic mutations in both types I and II EOCs.
Methods: Two hundred sixty-two evaluable, primary, high-risk stage I (grade 3, or aneuploid grade 1 or 2, or clear cell) and stage II-IV EOCs, collected at the University Hospitals Leuven and within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 55971 trial, were genotyped for hotspot mutations in KRAS (COSMIC [Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer] coverage >97%), BRAF (>94%), NRAS (>97%), PIK3CA (>79%), PTEN, FBXW7 (>57%), AKT2, AKT3, and FOXL2, using Sequenom MassARRAY.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!