Introduction: Retained rectal objects represent a rare complaint in the emergency room, affecting mainly males between 20 and 40 years, with most objects of a sexual nature, but the examiner must be aware of objects of an unusual nature.
Presentation Of Case: A 54-year-old male patient arrives at the surgical emergency department, with a report of an accident with the insertion of an object via the rectum, a gym dumbbell. Initially opted for transrectal object removal, but with difficulties due to its position.
Discussion: Retained rectal objects are a rare complaint in the emergency department, but with an increasingly important occurrence in recent years. Physical examination should include an assessment of the abdomen and digital rectal examination. Imaging tests are mandatory for diagnosis, with abdominal and pelvis radiography being the most requested. Although there is no consensus on the most appropriate removal technique, less invasive initial approaches are recommended, with transanal removal with a 60-75% success rate under local anesthesia. The follow-up after the procedure depends on several factors, and in general, the patient should be kept under observation and attention should be paid to significant changes in the evolution and alterations in the imaging tests.
Conclusion: The clinical history in these cases can be confusing, due to the patient's fear of reporting the complaints. Radiography is the best initial test, and CT is reserved for cases of suspected complications. Whenever possible, perform the extraction rectally.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9048151 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107051 | DOI Listing |
Radiat Oncol
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Background: Rectal cancer patients are potential beneficiaries of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) which demands considerable resources. Currently, there is no definite guidance on what kind of patients and when will benefit from ART. This study aimed to develop and validate a methodology for estimating ART requirements in rectal cancer before treatment course.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Public Health
December 2024
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract
December 2024
University of Ottawa, School of Nursing, Ottawa, Ontario.
Background: The practice of patient self-collected swab specimens for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis is supported in the literature.
Local Problem: Health care providers observed that patients sometimes performed their self-swabs incorrectly resulting in cancelled or invalid specimens.
Methods: The clinic's outdated visual aids were replaced with new visual aids.
J Surg Case Rep
November 2024
Orlando Health Colon and Rectal Institute, 110 W. Underwood St, Ste A, Orlando, FL 32806, United States.
Front Oncol
November 2024
Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Background: Conformal proctectomy with sphincter preservation (CPSP) is designed to preserve the rectal wall as much as possible in very low rectal cancer patients. Evaluations of anal function and quality of life outcomes are lacking.
Methods: This study included male patients with very low (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2022.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!