AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess and enhance the Veterans Health Administration’s Risk Index for Serious Prescription Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression or Overdose (RIOSORD) specifically for active duty service members.
  • The research involved a retrospective case-control design, matching 95 cases of documented opioid overdoses to 950 control subjects who received opioid prescriptions between 2018 and 2019.
  • Findings indicated that an active duty-specific RIOSORD retained only 6 of the initial 17 components, and while both versions showed fair predictive capabilities, the active duty RIOSORD demonstrated better sensitivity, suggesting a need for ongoing adjustments and improvements in risk assessment models.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the current cutoff score and a recalibrated adaptation of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Risk Index for Serious Prescription Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression or Overdose (RIOSORD) in active duty service members.

Design: Retrospective case-control.

Setting: Military Health System.

Subjects: Active duty service members dispensed ≥ 1 opioid prescription between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019.

Methods: Service members with a documented opioid overdose were matched 1:10 to controls. An active duty-specific (AD) RIOSORD was constructed using the VHA RIOSORD components. Analyses examined the risk stratification and predictive characteristics of two RIOSORD versions (VHA and AD).

Results: Cases (n = 95) were matched with 950 controls. Only 6 of the original 17 elements were retained in the AD RIOSORD. Long-acting or extended-release opioid prescriptions, antidepressant prescriptions, hospitalization, and emergency department visits were associated with overdose events. The VHA RIOSORD had fair performance (C-statistic 0.77, 95% CI 0.75, 0.79), while the AD RIOSORD did not demonstrate statistically significant performance improvement (C-statistic 0.78, 95% CI, 0.77, 0.80). The DoD selected cut point (VHA RIOSORD > 32) only identified 22 of 95 ORD outcomes (Sensitivity 0.23), while an AD-specific cut point (AD RIOSORD > 16) correctly identified 53 of 95 adverse events (Sensitivity 0.56).

Conclusions: Results highlight the need to continually recalibrate predictive models and to consider multiple measures of performance. Although both models had similar overall performance with respect to the C-statistic, an AD-specific index threshold improves sensitivity. The calibrated AD RIOSORD does not represent an end-state, but a bridge to a future model developed on a wider range of patient variables, taking into consideration features that capture both care received, and care that was not received.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnac064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

active duty
12
service members
12
vha riosord
12
riosord
10
opioid overdose
8
duty service
8
cut point
8
care received
8
vha
5
evaluation opioid
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!