A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Increasing Lesion Dimensions of Bipolar Ablation by Modulating the Surface Area of the Return Electrode. | LitMetric

Increasing Lesion Dimensions of Bipolar Ablation by Modulating the Surface Area of the Return Electrode.

JACC Clin Electrophysiol

Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address:

Published: April 2022

Objectives: This study sought to examine the effect of the return electrode's surface area on bipolar RFA lesion size.

Background: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is typically performed between 2 3.5-mm tip catheters serving as active and return electrodes. We hypothesized that increasing the surface area of the return electrode would increase lesion dimensions by reducing the circuit impedance, thus increasing the current into a larger tissue volume enclosed between the electrodes.

Methods: In step 1, ex vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and custom-made return electrodes with increasing surface areas (20, 80, 180 mm). In step 2, ex vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and 3.5-mm or 8-mm electrode catheters positioned perpendicular or parallel to the tissue. In step 3, in vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and either 3.5-mm or 8-mm parallel electrode at the: 1) left ventricular summit; 2) interventricular septum; and 3) healed anterior infarction.

Results: In step 1, increasing the surface area of the return electrode resulted in lower circuit impedance (R = -0.65; P < 0.001), higher current (R = +0.80; P < 0.001), and larger lesion volume (R = +0.88; P < 0.001). In step 2, an 8-mm return electrode parallel to tissue produced larger and deeper lesions compared with a 3.5-mm return electrode (P = 0.014 and P = 0.02). Similarly, in step 3, compared with a 3.5-mm, bipolar RFA with an 8-mm return electrode produced larger (volume: 1,525 ± 871 mm vs 306 ± 310 mm, respectively; P < 0.001) and more transmural lesions (88% vs 0%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Bipolar RFA using an 8-mm return electrode positioned parallel to the tissue produces larger lesions in comparison with a 3.5-mm return electrode.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2022.01.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

return electrode
32
bipolar rfa
24
surface area
16
performed 35-mm
16
p < 0001
16
area return
12
increasing surface
12
rfa performed
12
parallel tissue
12
8-mm return
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!