Background: Rockall score is the most widely used prognostic scale for assessing risk of complications from non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Several studies have been conducted in adult populations with non-varicose UGIB in different parts of the world, with conflicting findings regarding the extent of association between the score and some morbidity and mortality outcomes. Also, there is controversy regarding the best cut-off point for the score. Moreover, no studies validating this score in Colombia have been carried out.

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the Rockall score in predicting rebleeding and mortality in patients with non-varicose UGIB.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients requiring upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) for non-varicose bleeding. The pre-and post-endoscopy Rockall scores were calculated and outcomes, including mortality, UGIB-associated mortality and in hospital rebleeding were determined at the 1 and 3-month time points. The association between the scores and these outcomes was assessed using the chi2 or the Fisher test, whereas the discrimination ability of the score was determined using the areas under the ROC curve (AUC). High discrimination ability was considered to exist in cases in which an AUC ≤0.7 with α=0.05 could be rejected.

Results: Overall, 177 patients were analyzed. In-hospital outcomes at 1 and 3 months were 12%, 17% and 23% for general mortality, 6%, 12% and 15% for UGIB mortality, and 19%, 30% and 37% for rebleeding. The post-endoscopy Rockall score was associated with the three outcomes at the three time points assessed, while the pre-endoscopy score was only associated with general mortality at the three time points, and rebleeding at 1 and 3 months. Regarding discrimination ability, although the AUC was greater than expected by randomness (0.5) in all cases, only one AUC ≤0.7 was rejected in the post-endoscopy score for in-hospital UGIB mortality (AUC=0.901; 95%CI: 0.845-0.958), at 1 month (AUC=0.836; 95%CI: 0.717-0.954) and at 3 months (AUC=0.869; 95%CI: 0.771-0.967), and for rebleeding at 1 month (AUC=0.793; 95%CI: 0.725-0.861) and at 3 months (AUC=0.806; 95%CI: 0.741-0.871).

Conclusion: An association was found between the Rockall score and rebleeding and mortality in patients with non-varicose UGIB. Only the post-endoscopy score had a high predictive ability for rebleeding and UGIB mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.202200001-15DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rockall score
20
score
12
upper gastrointestinal
12
time points
12
discrimination ability
12
ugib mortality
12
mortality
10
non-varicose ugib
8
rebleeding mortality
8
mortality patients
8

Similar Publications

Background And Purpose: Esophageal and gastric varices hemorrhage (EGVH) is a life-threatening condition with the 6-week mortality rate of 15-25%. Up to 60% of patients with EGVH may experience rebleeding with a mortality rate of 33%. The existing scoring systems, such as RS scoring system (Rockall score, RS) and GBS scoring system (Glasgow-Blatchford score, GBS), have limitations in predicting the risk of rebleeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: In women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), a CT-based radiomic prognostic vector (RPV) predicted stromal phenotype and survival after primary surgery. The study's purpose was to fully externally validate RPV and its biological correlate.

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective study, ovarian masses on CT scans of HGSOC patients, who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery in an ESGO-certified Center between 2002 and 2017, were segmented for external RPV score calculation and then correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding still remains a challenge, which can cause serious clinical problems especially in high-risk patients. We present a rare case of patient with complex pathology successfully managed by endovascular treatment. A 78-year-old man with a medical history of chronic bronchitis, several minor strokes, type II diabetes, a 30-year history of smoking, and a family history of cardiovascular disease, presented with severe pain on the left side of his chest radiating to his left arm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The Rockall score and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are two scoring systems validated in the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, no meta-analysis exists to summarize the current data and clarify the use of Rockall score and GBS focusing on non-variceal UGIB. We aimed to evaluate and compare the utility of the Rockall score and GBS in predicting clinical outcomes in non-variceal UGIB.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a serious health issue that leads to significant patient risk and requires considerable healthcare resources, prompting a study on non-variceal bleeding severity related to certain medications.
  • The research analyzed 296 patients with UGIB at a hospital in Timisoara, categorizing them based on their use of drugs like NSAIDs, anticoagulants, and antiplatelet therapies, using statistical methods to assess the differences among groups.
  • Results indicated that patients taking NOACs experienced more severe bleeding and worse blood parameters than those on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), contradicting existing studies and highlighting the potential iatrogenic risks associated with these medications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!