A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Novel 3D printing method to reinforce implant-supported denture fiberglass as material for implant prosthesis: A pilot study. | LitMetric

Novel 3D printing method to reinforce implant-supported denture fiberglass as material for implant prosthesis: A pilot study.

Clin Exp Dent Res

Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.

Published: June 2022

Objectives: Despite a large amount of materials and methods to make an implant-supported denture, nowadays there is no gold standard. Every solution has pros and cons that guide the clinician and the technician to choose the best solution for a single case. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical characteristics of the fiber-reinforced composite superstructure made by using a novel three-dimensional (3D) printing technology able to create a reinforcing structure patient-specific, more reliable, structurally optimized, and faster than conventional methods.

Materials And Methods: To evaluate mechanical performances of 3D-printed fiberglass, mechanical characterization of 3D-printed material was performed. Before proceeding with the realization of the final prosthesis, five specimens were created on which the tensile test and volumetric fiber content measurement were performed. Then denture reinforcement 3D printing process began. Initially, the robot prints layers of fiber. Finally, the obtained 3D-printed reinforcement structure was finalized in the lab.

Results: The prosthesis obtained through this process was lighter than a traditional prosthesis, there was a greater chemical adhesion between resin and 3D-printed reinforcement structure and a better result was obtained from an esthetic point of view.

Conclusions: The outcomes we obtained endorse its performance both mechanical and esthetic. The entire process is automatic and does not require human operation thanks to specific software programming.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9209793PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.568DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implant-supported denture
8
evaluate mechanical
8
3d-printed reinforcement
8
reinforcement structure
8
novel printing
4
printing method
4
method reinforce
4
reinforce implant-supported
4
denture fiberglass
4
fiberglass material
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!