We examined the long-term risk for stalking recidivism and the predictive validity of ratings made using the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM) in 100 stalking offenders from a forensic clinic. Overall, 45 offenders were convicted of, charged with, or the subject of police investigation for stalking-related offenses during a potential time at risk that averaged 13.47 years. Survival analyses using the Cox proportional hazards model indicated that a composite score of the presence of SAM risk factors was significantly predictive of recidivism and had significant incremental validity relative to total scores on two scales commonly used in violence risk assessment, the Screening Version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL:SV) and the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG). Overall ratings of risk made using the SAM, however, were not significantly predictive of recidivism. We discuss the potential uses of the SAM in stalking risk assessment and provide recommendations for future research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149883PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221086050DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stalking recidivism
8
guidelines stalking
8
stalking assessment
8
assessment management
8
management sam
8
predictive recidivism
8
violence risk
8
risk assessment
8
risk
7
stalking
5

Similar Publications

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of treatments approaches in reducing the risk of reoffending in stalking perpetrators.

Design: A systematic search was conducted on Medline/Pubmed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus.

Setting: The United States, United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Italy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An Examination of Predictive Validity and Change in Risk Factors for Stalking over Time.

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law

September 2023

Dr. Penney is an Independent Scientist in the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Ulrich is a Staff Psychiatrist at the University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Ms. Maheandiran is a Research Coordinator in the Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

This study investigates the predictive validity of two risk instruments for stalking, the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM) and the Stalking Risk Profile (SRP), in a sample of 86 forensic psychiatric patients. We compare these tools against a well-validated violence risk assessment measure (Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3)) for violent and stalking-related outcomes. Dynamic (mutable) components of each tool were rated at three annual intervals and revealed significant change across time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We examined the long-term risk for stalking recidivism and the predictive validity of ratings made using the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM) in 100 stalking offenders from a forensic clinic. Overall, 45 offenders were convicted of, charged with, or the subject of police investigation for stalking-related offenses during a potential time at risk that averaged 13.47 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The criminal offense of stalking is somewhat different to other offenses due to the repetitive, innocuous, and often multifaceted nature of the crime. Given that stalking constitutes a number of different behaviors, such as violence and threats, research on stalking recidivism becomes difficult as recidivism can be defined in a number of ways. This study utilized a dataset of Western Australia Police Force incident reports, comprising a sample of 404 stalking offenders.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preventing and reducing domestic violence is a national and international social priority. Civil law protection orders (POs) have been the primary legal response to domestic violence internationally for a number of decades. However, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed due to variations in application within and across countries and variable quality of the research with most studies at high risk of bias.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!