AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effectiveness of two internal fixation methods (unilateral vs. bilateral) for treating congenital scoliosis through hemivertebra resection using a posterior approach in 29 children aged 0.9 to 15 years.
  • Results showed that bilateral internal fixation had a shorter surgical time and less blood loss compared to unilateral fixation, with both methods leading to significant improvements in spinal curvature post-surgery.
  • While bilateral fixation showed a better initial correction rate for scoliosis angles, both methods had similar outcomes at the final follow-up, suggesting that unilateral fixation can also be an effective treatment option.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the curative efficacy of hemivertebra resection the posterior approach assisted with unilateral and bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of congenital scoliosis (CS).

Methods: In this study, 29 children (15 males and 14 females), who underwent hemivertebra resection the posterior approach and received internal fixation from November 2005 to September 2018, were analyzed retrospectively. The age of these patients ranged from 0.9 to 15 years, with an average of 3.8 years. The follow-up duration ranged from 2 to 12.3 years, with an average of 5.7 years. The patients in group A received unilateral internal fixation, and those in group B received bilateral internal fixation. The operation duration, bleeding volume, and complications during the operation, as well as the Cobb angles of scoliosis and kyphosis before and after the operation and at the last follow-up, were compared between the two groups.

Results: In group A, the operation duration was 207.4 ± 54.5 min, and the bleeding volume was 215.3 ± 75.4 ml; in group B, the operation duration was 249.5 ± 51.0 min, and the bleeding volume was 291.3 ± 115.6 ml ( < 0.05). The Cobb angles of segmental scoliosis, segmental kyphosis, cephalic compensatory curve, and caudal compensatory curve were significantly improved in the two groups after operation and at the last follow-up ( < 0.05). The post-operative correction rate of the scoliosis Cobb angle was 67.2% in group A and 79.5% in group B; and the difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the correction rate of the scoliosis Cobb angle was 72.7% in group A and 76.2% in group B ( > 0.05). After the operation and at the last follow-up, the correction rates of kyphosis were 83.1 and 79.6% in group A and 71.8 and 65.5% in group B ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: Hemivertebra resection posterior approach with unilateral internal fixation can also achieve the effect of bilateral internal fixation in the treatment of CS. It is able to preserve a certain degree of contralateral spinal growth potential and is a feasible method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9010512PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.821387DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internal fixation
28
hemivertebra resection
16
resection posterior
16
posterior approach
16
bilateral internal
16
fixation treatment
12
operation duration
12
bleeding volume
12
operation follow-up
12
group
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!