Hip hemiarthroplasty is considered the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly less active patients. One important complication of this procedure is an intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture (IPF), which may lead to poor functional outcome and may increase morbidity and mortality. Our primary aim in this study is to compare between Austin-Moore and Corail prosthesis regarding IPFs. Our secondary aim is to assess patient and surgical technique related risk factors for the development of this complication. Inclusion criteria included patients older than 65 years of age who had a displaced femoral neck fracture and were operated for hip hemiarthroplasty between the years 2014-2018. Patient-specific data was collected retrospectively including age, gender, comorbidities, pre-injury ambulatory status, duration of surgery, surgical approach, use of Austin-Moore or Corail prosthesis, surgeon's experience and type of anesthesia applied. In addition, radiographs were reviewed for measurement of calcar to canal ratio (CDR) and classification of Dorr canal type. 257 patients with an average age of 83.7 years were enrolled in the study. 118 patients (46%) were treated with an Austin-Moore prosthesis, while 139 (54%) were treated with a Corail prosthesis. A total of 22 patients (8.6%) had intraoperative fractures. Fracture prevalence was significantly higher in the Corail group compared with the Austin-Moore group (12.2% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.025). The majority of patients had a Dorr A type femoral canal, while the rest had Dorr B type canal (70% vs. 30%). There was no difference in fracture prevalence between Dorr A and B canal type patients. We didn't find any significant risk factor for developing an IPF, neither patient wise (age, gender, and comorbidities) nor surgical technique related (surgical approach, type of anesthesia, and surgeon's experience). Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture prevalence was significantly higher in the Corail patient group compared with the Austin-Moore group. This may be an important advantage of the Austin-Moore prosthesis over the Corail prosthesis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012879PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10384-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

corail prosthesis
20
austin-moore corail
12
intraoperative periprosthetic
12
hip hemiarthroplasty
12
fracture prevalence
12
periprosthetic femur
8
displaced femoral
8
femoral neck
8
surgical technique
8
age gender
8

Similar Publications

Mid-term outcomes of compaction autologous bone grafting in uncemented primary total hip replacement stems.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

December 2024

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eniwa Hospital, 2-1-1, Koganechuou, Eniwa, Koganechuou, Hokkaido, 061-1449, Japan.

Introduction: Fixation and long-term stability of collared, uncemented stems, such as the CORAIL collared stem, in total hip arthroplasty (THA), depend on a strong cancellous bone sleeve and subsequent osseointegration. This study aimed to investigate bone reaction and mid-term outcomes following compaction autologous bone grafting in uncemented stems in primary THA.

Materials And Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients with primary THA using CORAIL collared stem and having ≥ 5 years follow-up.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Subsidence of the Corail stem in total hip arthroplasty: no influence of bony contact.

J Orthop Traumatol

November 2024

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, 52152, Simmerath, Germany.

Introduction: This study investigated stem subsidence following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a Corail stem in patients who underwent two-staged bilateral THA. The second outcome of interest was to investigate whether a specific single cortical bone contact point might reduce postoperative stem subsidence.

Methods: The present study was conducted following the STROBE guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To assess the effect of adjuvant antibiotic-loaded hydrogel application on the primary stability of implanted uncemented hip stems.

Design: Biomechanical study.

Setting: An electro-mechanic material test system (#5866, Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) equipped with a 10-kN load cell was used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Though radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for migration tracking, computed tomography-based RSA (CT-RSA) does not require marker beads and is available for clinical adoption. This study investigated CT-RSA in comparison to RSA for assessing hip implant stability with inducible displacement (ID) examinations. Patients (n = 48) from a previous study returned to be re-examined for femoral stem stability with CT-RSA and RSA imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose:  Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a significant complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although biomechanical studies have indicated that the technique by which the femoral canal is prepared plays a role, few clinical studies have reported on how this might affect the fracture risk. This study compares the fracture risk between compaction and broaching with toothed instruments in cementless THA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!