A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparing forefoot and heel stiffnesses across commercial prosthetic feet manufactured for individuals with varying body weights and foot sizes. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the stiffness properties of prosthetic foot models to understand how they affect the gait of individuals with lower limb amputations.
  • Researchers tested five types of commercial prosthetic feet across various user body weights and foot sizes to gather stiffness data for both the forefoot and heel.
  • Results indicated a significant link between user weight and foot stiffness, but there were inconsistencies across foot types, highlighting the need for more objective data to help clinicians match prosthetics to users' needs effectively.

Article Abstract

Background: Despite the effects of prosthetic foot mechanical properties on gait of people with lower limb amputation, scant forefoot and heel stiffness data exist to help guide prosthetic foot prescription.

Objective: To measure forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across commonly prescribed commercial prosthetic foot models and to describe variations in stiffness across feet targeted for users with different body weights and foot sizes.

Study Design: Mechanical testing of five types of commercial prosthetic feet across nine user body weight and foot size combinations.

Methods: Linear forefoot and heel stiffness (force vs. displacement) data were collected for 41 prosthetic feet. Quasistatic testing was conducted at -15 and +20 degrees to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot, respectively.

Results: Overall, there was a significant relationship between user body weight and both forefoot and heel stiffness, when adjusted for foot size and type ( P < 0.001). However, there were a substantial number of inconsistencies across foot type within example user body weight and foot sizes combination. Furthermore, the relative order of forefoot stiffness across foot type differed from the relative order of heel stiffness across foot type.

Conclusions: The inconsistencies and differences in relative order of forefoot and heel stiffness across commercial foot type suggest the importance of publishing objective stiffness and other mechanical properties of prosthetic feet. These data can aid clinicians in better matching mechanical properties of prosthetic feet with the functional goals and abilities of prosthesis users.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forefoot heel
24
prosthetic feet
20
heel stiffness
20
commercial prosthetic
12
foot
12
prosthetic foot
12
mechanical properties
12
user body
12
body weight
12
foot type
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!