https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=35421894&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 354218942022041820220716
1945-71039232022May01The Angle orthodontistAngle OrthodRoot resorption in relation to a modified piezocision technique.347352347-35210.2319/121520-1009.1To evaluate root resorption of lower incisors and canines quantitatively in a group of patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with piezocision and/or a collagen reinforcement technique with a fully resorbable three-dimensional (3D) collagen xenograft matrix compared with a control group.The study sample of this secondary analysis consisted of 32 periodontally healthy patients with angle Class I malocclusion or mild Class II or III malocclusion and moderate irregularity index scores who underwent orthodontic treatment and had before (T0) and after treatment (T1) cone-beam computed tomography scans. Root resorption of lower incisors and canines was assessed quantitatively in the following four groups: the control group received orthodontic treatment without piezocision, experimental group 1 received orthodontic treatment with piezocision, experimental group 2 received orthodontic treatment with piezocision and a 3D collagen matrix, and experimental group 3 received orthodontic treatment with a 3D collagen matrix.An overall statistically significant decrease in root length from T0 to T1 for all groups was observed (P < .05). However, there was no significant difference among the groups in the amount of root length decrease from T0 to T1.Orthodontic treatment combined with piezocision does not increase the risk of root resorption of lower incisors and canines when compared with orthodontic treatment without acceleration techniques. More studies with larger samples should be undertaken to confirm these results.© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.AranaJuliana GómezJGReyDiegoDRíosHéctorHÁlvarezMaría AntoniaMACevidanesLuciaLRuellasAntonio CACAristizábalJuan FernandoJFengJournal Article
United StatesAngle Orthod03705500003-3219IMCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansIncisordiagnostic imagingsurgeryMalocclusion, Angle Class IetiologyRoot Resorptiondiagnostic imagingetiologyTooth Movement Techniquesadverse effectsCorticotomiesPiezocisionRoot resorptionTooth resorption
2021111202012120224142017202241560202241960202251ppublish35421894PMC902040510.2319/121520-1009.1476469Darcey J, Qualtrough A. Root resorption: simplifying diagnosis and improving outcomes. Prim Dent J . 2016;5(2):36–45.28826432Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, et al. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2010;137(4):462–476.20362905Fuss Z, Tsesis I, Lin S. Root resorption—diagnosis, classification and treatment choices based on stimulation factors. Dent Traumatol . 2003;19(4):175–182.12848710Abuabara A. Biomechanical aspects of external root resorption in orthodontic therapy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal . 2007;12(8):E610–E613.18059250Roscoe MG, Meira JB, Cattaneo PM. Association of orthodontic force system and root resorption: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2015;147(5):610–626.25919107Gupta V, Dhaliwal YS, Dhaliwal A. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a review. Dent J Adv Stud . 2016;4:8–14.Aristizábal JF, Bellaiza W, Ortiz MA, et al. Clinical and systemic effects of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics: a pilot study. Int J Odontostomat . 2016;10:119–127.Aristizábal JF. Accelerated orthodontics and express transit orthodontics (ETO)®, a contemporary concept of high efficiency. CES Odontol . 2014;27:56–73.Abbas NH, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2016;149(4):473–480.27021451Charavet C, Lecloux G, Jackers N, et al. Piezocision-assisted orthodontic treatment using CAD/CAM customized orthodontic appliances: a randomized controlled trial in adults. Eur J Orthod . 2019;41(5):495–501.30649257Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, et al. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod . 2016;17(1):33.PMC507552827696311Ferguson DJ, Wilcko MT, Wilcko WM, et al. Scope of treatment with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics therapy. Semin Orthod . 2015;21:176–186.Yavuz MC, Sunar O, Buyuk SK, et al. Comparison of piezocision and discision methods in orthodontic treatment. Prog Orthod . 2018;19(1):44.PMC620443130370430Linjawi AI, Abushal AM, Al-Zahrani AM, et al. Patients' perceptions to reduced orthodontic treatment time in Saudi Arabia. Patient Prefer Adherence . 2019;13:1973–1981.PMC687526631819379Li Y, Jacox LA, Little SH, et al. Orthodontic tooth movement: the biology and clinical implications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci . 2018;34(4):207–214.29655409Fleming PS. Accelerating orthodontic tooth movement using surgical and non-surgical approaches. Evid Based Dent . 2014;15(4):114–115.25522944Little RM. The irregularity index: a quantitative score of mandibular anterior alignment. Am J Orthod . 1975;68(5):554–563.1059332Dibart S, Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J. Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated orthodontic tooth movement procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent . 2009;30(6):342–350.19715011Ruellas AC, Yatabe MS, Souki BQ, et al. 3D mandibular superimposition: comparison of regions of reference for voxel-based registration. PLoS One . 2016;11(6):e0157625.PMC491900527336366Ruellas AC, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Gomes MR, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of 2 regions of reference for maxillary regional registration with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop . 2016;149(4):533–542.PMC481736027021458Yi J, Xiao J, Li Y, et al. Efficacy of piezocision on accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod . 2017;87(4):491–498.PMC836669628429956Parker RJ, Harris EF. Directions of orthodontic tooth movements associated with external apical root resorption of the maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 1998;114(6):677–683.9844208Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: part 1. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 1993;103(1):62–66.8422033Aksakalli S, Calik B, Kara B, et al. Accelerated tooth movement with piezocision and its periodontal-transversal effects in patients with Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod . 2016;86(1):59–65.PMC860397225989211Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, et al. Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res . 2016;95(9):1003–1009.27129491Chan EK, Darendeliler MA. Exploring the third dimension in root resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res . 2004;7(2):64–70.15180085Darcey J, Qualtrough A. Resorption: part 2. Diagnosis and management. Br Dent J . 2013;214(10):493–509.23703177Chan E, Dalci O, Petocz P, et al. Physical properties of root cementum: part 26. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2018;153(2):204–213.29407497Thind SK, Chatterjee A, Arshad F, et al. A clinical comparative evaluation of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with piezo and surgical bur: an interdisciplinary approach. J Indian Soc Periodontol . 2018;22(4):328–333.PMC607795730131625Songra G, Clover M, Atack NE, et al. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2014;145:569–578.24785921Jacobs C, Gebhardt PF, Jacobs V, et al. Root resorption, treatment time and extraction rate during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Head Face Med . 2014;10:2.PMC392295324456620Johansson K, Lundström F. Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod . 2012;82(5):929–934.PMC882312522397386Pandis N, Nasika M, Polychronopoulou A, et al. External apical root resorption in patients treated with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2008;134(5):646–651.18984396Patterson BM, Dalci O, Papadopoulou AK, et al. Effect of piezocision on root resorption associated with orthodontic force: a microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop . 2017;151(1):53–62.28024782Makhoul F, Jaafo MH, Ajai M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of alveolar corticotomy on reducing orthodontic root resorption. J Indian Dent Assoc . 2014;8:31–40.Machado I, Ferguson DJ, Wilcko TM, et al. Reabsorción radicular después del tratamiento ortodóncico con o sin corticotomía alveolar. Rev Venez Ortod . 2002;19(1):647–653.