AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on the barriers preventing bystanders (friends/family of opioid users) from obtaining naloxone, an essential medication to combat overdose deaths, despite its widespread availability in pharmacies due to standing orders in Massachusetts.
  • Many surveyed bystanders (77%) had obtained naloxone at some point, but only 21% had attempted to buy it from a pharmacy, revealing a significant gap in pharmacy utilization.
  • Key barriers identified include misconceptions about overdose risk, denial about a loved one’s drug use, fears of stigma and confidentiality, and inaccuracies regarding naloxone’s effects on drug use behavior.

Article Abstract

Background: Expanding access to the opioid antagonist naloxone to reduce overdose mortality is a public health priority in the United States. Naloxone standing orders (NSOs) have been established in many states to increase naloxone dispensing at pharmacies, but increased pharmacy access does not ensure optimal uptake among those likely to witness an overdose. In a prior statewide purchase trial, we documented high levels of naloxone access at Massachusetts pharmacies under a statewide NSO. In this study, we characterize barriers to pharmacy-based naloxone uptake among potential opioid overdose "bystanders" (friends or family of people who use opioids) that may be amenable to intervention.

Methods: Eligible bystanders were Massachusetts residents ≥ 18 years of age, did not use illicit opioids in the past 30 days, and knew someone who currently uses illicit opioids. We used a sequential mixed methods approach, in which a series of semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 22) were conducted April-July 2018, to inform the development of a subsequent quantitative survey (N = 260), conducted February-July 2020.

Results: Most survey participants (77%) reported ever obtaining naloxone but few (21%) attempted to purchase it at a pharmacy. Qualitative participants revealed that barriers to utilizing the NSO included low perceived risk of overdose, which was rooted in misconceptions regarding the risks of prescription opioid misuse, denial about their loved one's drug use, and drug use stereotypes; inaccurate beliefs about the impact of naloxone on riskier opioid use; and concerns regarding anticipated stigma and confidentiality. Many participants had engaged in mutual support groups, which served as a source of free naloxone for half (50%) of those who had ever obtained naloxone.

Conclusions: Despite high levels of pharmacy naloxone access in Massachusetts, few bystanders in our study had attempted to obtain naloxone under the NSO. Low perceived risk of overdose, misinformation, stigma, and confidentiality were important barriers to pharmacy naloxone uptake, all of which are amenable to intervention. Support groups provided a setting for addressing stigma and misinformation and provided a discreet and comfortable setting for naloxone access. Where these groups do not exist and for bystanders who do not participate in such groups, pharmacies are well-positioned to fill gaps in naloxone availability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9006069PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13078-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

naloxone
14
naloxone access
12
pharmacy-based naloxone
8
people opioids
8
mixed methods
8
high levels
8
access massachusetts
8
naloxone uptake
8
illicit opioids
8
low perceived
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!