The effects of developmental trauma on theory of mind and its relationship to psychotic experiences: A behavioural study.

Psychiatry Res

Translational Psychiatry Research Group, Research Department of Mental Health Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, UCL Institute of Mental Health, University College London, Wing A, 6th floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF United Kingdom; Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom; NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Research & Development, University College Hospital, Maple House Suite A 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN United Kingdom; Psychiatric Imaging Group, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Imperial College London, W12 0NN United Kingdom; The Traumatic Stress Clinic, St Pancras Hospital, Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: June 2022

Background: Developmental psychological trauma induces vulnerability to psychosis. However, the mechanisms underlying this association are poorly understood. Impairments in Theory of Mind (ToM) have been observed in adult survivors of developmental trauma and individuals with psychosis. ToM is therefore a candidate mechanism underlying the association between developmental trauma and psychosis.

Methods: We used a computerised version of the Director task - where a participant is instructed by a confederate to move an object around a 4 × 4 grid, whilst taking account of whether these objects are visible to a confederate who instructs the participant - to investigate impairments in ToM in 209 participants (age: M = 37.8, SD=13.6; 56% female). Participants were divided into a) developmental trauma-positive (DT+) and control groups (DT-) based on their history of developmental trauma and b) then further into subclinical (S) and healthy groups (H) as based on psychotic experiences indexed by the CAPE-P15. After exclusion, the numbers in each group were: DT+H (47), DT+S (84), DT-H (54), DT-S (12). (Total: 197).

Results: Developmental trauma exposure was associated with psychotic experiences (OR: 7.89, p < .001), which remained significant after controlling for demographic and clinical confounds (adjusted R = 0.452, R change = 0.0184, p = .009). Participants with developmental trauma (F) = 5.46, p = .020, ηp = 0.027) and participants more prone to psychotic experiences (F) = 4.71, p = .031, ηp = 0.024) demonstrated significantly lower accuracy on the Director task relative to their respective control, after controlling for the effects of age.

Conclusions: ToM deficits are associated with self-reported developmental trauma and psychotic experiences. Further work is needed to explore these relationships further and whether they represent generalised or specific effect effects on developmental trauma and psychopathological domains.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114544DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

developmental trauma
32
psychotic experiences
20
trauma
9
developmental
9
effects developmental
8
theory mind
8
underlying association
8
director task
8
psychotic
5
experiences
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!