In late 2020, during the second wave of COVID-19 in Germany, we started using the MobyBox, which is a novel fully pneumatically driven ECMO device, on a regular basis to meet the increasing demand for ECMO therapy. In this case series, we performed a retrospective chart review of seven patients with severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring veno-venous (vv)-ECMO support with the MobyBox. During ECMO treatments we have observed no disadvantages in comparison to conventional ECMO systems. There were no system failures or adverse events directly attributable to the MobyBox system. Our data support that providing vv-ECMO with the MobyBox device is safe and feasible. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the MobyBox device might represent an advantage in terms of biocompatibility. Therefore, more data on this issue is needed to better understand how the pneumatically driven pump affects cellular blood components.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001685 | DOI Listing |
ASAIO J
August 2022
From the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARDS/ECMO-Center, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Ann Thorac Surg
June 2020
Center for Acute Respiratory Failure, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is rapidly becoming a mainstream technology for lung or heart/lung support. Current ECMO devices mostly consist of a power-driven centrifugal pump and a dedicated oxygenator. We studied the safety and efficacy of a novel, fully pneumatically driven ECMO device, which could be used in both venovenous or venoarterial mode in an animal model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!