Validation of an Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Risk-Prediction Model in a Chinese Cohort.

Background: The novel arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)-associated ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) risk-prediction model endorsed by Cadrin-Tourigny et al. was recently developed to estimate visual VA risk and was identified to be more effective for predicting ventricular events than the International Task Force Consensus (ITFC) criteria, and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) criteria. Data regarding its application in Asians are lacking.

Objectives: We aimed to perform an external validation of this algorithm in the Chinese ARVC population.

Methods: The study enrolled 88 ARVC patients who received implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) from January 2005 to January 2020. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapies. The novel prediction model was used to calculate a priori predicted VA risk that was compared with the observed rates.

Results: During a median follow-up of 3.9 years, 57 (64.8%) patients received the ICD therapy. Patients with implanted ICDs for primary prevention had non-significantly lower rates of ICD therapy than secondary prevention (5-year event rate: 0.46 (0.13-0.66) and 0.80 (0.64-0.89); log-rank = 0.098). The validation study revealed the C-statistic of 0.833 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.615-1.000), and the predicted and the observed patterns were similar in primary prevention patients (mean predicted-observed risk: -0.07 (95% CI -0.21, 0.09)). However, in secondary prevention patients, the C-statistic was 0.640 (95% CI 0.510-0.770) and the predicted risk was significantly underestimated (mean predicted-observed risk: -0.32 (95% CI -0.39, -0.24)). The recalibration analysis showed that the performance of the prediction model in secondary prevention patients was improved, with the mean predicted-observed risk of -0.04 (95% CI -0.10, 0.03).

Conclusions: The novel risk-prediction model had a good fitness to predict arrhythmic risk in Asian ARVC patients for primary prevention, and for secondary prevention patients after recalibration of the baseline risk.