AI Article Synopsis

  • The study looks at how well a Mixed Reality Viewer (MRV) works for understanding the blood vessels in patients with a certain condition called abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
  • Researchers used special scans (CTAs) of 50 patients to see if the MRV could help. They compared it to a regular way of looking at the scans on a computer screen.
  • The MRV did a good job for most things like spotting calcification and dilatation, but the regular viewer was better at finding some specific arteries. They suggest that the MRV could be very useful in hospitals, but it needs some improvements.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The objective is to evaluate the feasibility and interobserver agreement of a Mixed Reality Viewer (MRV) in the assessment of aortoiliac vascular anatomy of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients.

Methods: Fifty preoperative computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) of AAA patients were included. CTAs were assessed in a mixed reality (MR) environment with respect to aortoiliac anatomy according to a standardized protocol by two experienced observers (Mixed Reality Viewer, MRV, Brainlab AG, Germany). Additionally, all CTAs were independently assessed applying the same protocol by the same observers using a conventional DICOM viewer on a two-dimensional screen with multi-planar reconstructions (Conventional viewer, CV, GE Centricity PACS RA1000 Workstation, GE, United States). The protocol included four sets of items: calcification, dilatation, patency, and tortuosity as well as the number of lumbar and renal arteries. Interobserver agreement (IA, Cohen's Kappa, ) was calculated for every item set.

Results: All CTAs could successfully be displayed in the MRV (100%). The MRV demonstrated equal or better IA in the assessment of anterior and posterior calcification (: 0.68 and 0.61, : 0.33 and 0.45, respectively) as well as tortuosity (: 0.60, : 0.48) and dilatation (: 0.68, : 0.67). The CV demonstrated better IA in the assessment of patency (: 0.74, : 0.93). The CV also identified significantly more lumbar arteries (CV: 379, MRV: 239, < 0.01).

Conclusions: The MRV is a feasible imaging viewing technology in clinical routine. Future efforts should aim at improving hologram quality and enabling accurate registration of the hologram with the physical patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17085381221081324DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mixed reality
16
interobserver agreement
12
assessment aortoiliac
8
aortoiliac anatomy
8
abdominal aortic
8
aortic aneurysm
8
feasibility interobserver
8
reality viewer
8
viewer mrv
8
better assessment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!