A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validity of a multidimensional comprehensive psychosocial screening instrument based on the ESC cardiovascular prevention guidelines - Evidence from the general and cardiovascular patient population. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to assess the psychometric properties and validity of an updated Dutch psychosocial screening tool for patients with coronary heart disease and the general population, following European Society for Cardiology guidelines.
  • A total of 990 participants, including cardiac patients and general population members, completed the screening instrument alongside established questionnaires to evaluate various psychological risk factors.
  • Results indicated that the screening tool effectively measures distinct risk factors, demonstrating good agreement with established questionnaires, and is recommended for use in primary care and cardiology settings, with minor suggestions for improvement.

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of the updated version of the Dutch multidimensional Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument in patients with coronary heart disease and the general population, based upon guideline recommendations from the European Society for Cardiology.

Method: 678 participants (M = 48.2, SD = 16.8; 46% male) of the Dutch general population and 312 cardiac patients (M = 65.9, SD = 9.9; 77% male) who recently received percutaneous coronary intervention completed the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument and validated questionnaires for depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), Type D personality (DS14), hostility (CMHS), anger (STAS-T), trauma (SRIP), and chronic work and family stress (ERI, MMQ-6).

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the eight screened risk factors were best measured as separate entities, rather than broader indications of distress. Inter-instrument agreement, assessed with the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and the screening accuracy indicators (receiving operator characteristic [ROC] curves, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values [PPV; NPV]) were good for most screened risk factors. PPV was low in low prevalence risk factors like anxiety, trauma, and depression.

Conclusion: Overall, the current version of the Comprehensive Psychosocial Screening Instrument has an acceptable performance in both populations, with a fair to excellent level of agreement with established full questionnaires. Besides a few suggestions for further refinement, the screener may be implemented in primary care and cardiological practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110791DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comprehensive psychosocial
16
psychosocial screening
16
screening instrument
16
risk factors
12
multidimensional comprehensive
8
general population
8
screened risk
8
screening
5
validity multidimensional
4
comprehensive
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!