AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate a prediction model using 3-view X-rays to assess knee pain patients for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or no surgery.
  • A dataset of 8,301 X-ray images from 2,767 patients was analyzed, and a computer vision model was trained using transfer learning, with its performance evaluated on a separate test set.
  • The AI model showed high accuracy rates of 87.8% overall, with specific scores of 97% for TKA candidates, 96% for UKA, and 98% for no surgery, confirming its effectiveness in predicting surgical candidates.

Article Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to assess the viability of a knee arthroplasty prediction model using 3-view X-rays that helps determine if patients with knee pain are candidates for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or are not arthroplasty candidates.

Methods: Analysis was performed using radiographic and surgical data from a high-volume joint replacement practice. The dataset included 3 different X-ray views (anterior-posterior, lateral, and sunrise) for 2,767 patients along with information of whether that patient underwent an arthroplasty surgery (UKA or TKA) or not. This resulted in a dataset including 8,301 images from 2,707 patients. This dataset was then split into a training set (70%) and holdout test set (30%). A computer vision model was trained using a transfer learning approach. The performance of the computer vision model was evaluated on the holdout test set. Accuracy and multiclass receiver operating characteristic area under curve was used to evaluate the performance of the model.

Results: The artificial intelligence model achieved an accuracy of 87.8% on the holdout test set and a quadratic Cohen's kappa score of 0.811. The multiclass receiver operating characteristic area under curve score for TKA was calculated to be 0.97; for UKA a score of 0.96 and for No Surgery a score of 0.98 was achieved. An accuracy of 93.8% was achieved for predicting Surgery versus No Surgery and 88% for TKA versus not TKA was achieved.

Conclusion: The artificial intelligence/machine learning model demonstrated viability for predicting which patients are candidates for a UKA, TKA, or no surgical intervention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knee arthroplasty
16
holdout test
12
test set
12
artificial intelligence/machine
8
intelligence/machine learning
8
prediction model
8
uka tka
8
computer vision
8
vision model
8
multiclass receiver
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!