AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers created a way to decide which surgeries should be done first after COVID-19, focusing on how it affects people's health and costs.
  • They looked at 13 common surgeries and found that delaying surgeries like hip replacements really affects people's quality of life the most, while some surgeries have lower impacts.
  • The study showed that waiting for surgeries led to a big money loss for the hospital, especially after the first COVID-19 wave, and their framework can help hospitals prioritize surgeries better in the future.

Article Abstract

Objective: To develop a prioritisation framework to support priority setting for elective surgeries after COVID-19 based on the impact on patient well-being and cost.

Design: We developed decision analytical models to estimate the consequences of delayed elective surgical procedures (eg, total hip replacement, bariatric surgery or septoplasty).

Setting: The framework was applied to a large hospital in the Netherlands.

Outcome Measures: Quality measures impacts on quality of life and costs were taken into account and combined to calculate net monetary losses per week delay, which quantifies the total loss for society expressed in monetary terms. Net monetary losses were weighted by operating times.

Results: We studied 13 common elective procedures from four specialties. Highest loss in quality of life due to delayed surgery was found for total hip replacement (utility loss of 0.27, ie, 99 days lost in perfect health); the lowest for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (utility loss of 0.05, ie, 18 days lost in perfect health). Costs of surgical delay per patient were highest for bariatric surgery (€31/pp per week) and lowest for arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (-€2/pp per week). Weighted by operating room (OR) time bariatric surgery provides most value (€1.19/pp per OR minute) and arthroscopic partial meniscectomy provides the least value (€0.34/pp per OR minute). In a large hospital the net monetary loss due to prolonged waiting times was €700 840 after the first COVID-19 wave, an increase of 506% compared with the year before.

Conclusions: This surgical prioritisation framework can be tailored to specific centres and countries to support priority setting for delayed elective operations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, both in and between surgical disciplines. In the long-term, the framework can contribute to the efficient distribution of OR time and will therefore add to the discussion on appropriate use of healthcare budgets. The online framework can be accessed via: https://stanwijn.shinyapps.io/priORitize/.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995574PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delayed elective
12
bariatric surgery
12
net monetary
12
arthroscopic partial
12
partial meniscectomy
12
decision analytical
8
operating room
8
elective surgeries
8
surgeries covid-19
8
covid-19 pandemic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!