Purpose: Research priorities are often set by expert clinicians and researchers. We sought to apply an established process in patient-centered research to engage survivors and their caregivers in prioritizing research topics in prostate cancer.

Materials And Methods: A prostate cancer patient survey network, formed in partnership with Us TOO and the National Alliance of State Prostate Cancer Coalitions, engaged in a series of mixed-methods studies to prioritize comparative effectiveness research questions. This was accomplished through an iterative process that included 2 survey rounds and multidisciplinary working groups.

Results: There were 591 and 706 survey respondents in the first and second rounds, respectively, with most having had localized prostate cancer (58.1%). Survey participants represented 45 states in the U.S. Five of the top 11 prioritized research questions related to treatment decision making and/or survivorship care. The following had the highest overall importance ratings: What is the comparative effectiveness of different 1) strategies to improve counseling regarding the side effects of prostate cancer treatment, 2) tools for decision making in localized prostate cancer and 3) sequences of treatments for metastatic prostate cancer?

Conclusions: We present a unique, patient-centered list of prioritized research questions among prostate cancer patients and their caregivers. These research questions may inform funding decisions for organizations that support research, and should be considered as priorities for clinicians, researchers and institutions conducting prostate cancer research. Prostate cancer is a common disease that affects 1 in 9 men over their lifetime. Researchers usually identify questions to study without asking men with prostate cancer. We asked survivors of prostate cancer and their caregivers to help us. They identified research questions and topics that are important to them. Researchers can focus on this list of questions to help men with prostate cancer. Groups who pay for research studies can make these questions their priority.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707331PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002694DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
48
prostate
14
cancer
12
clinicians researchers
8
comparative effectiveness
8
questions
8
localized prostate
8
prioritized questions
8
decision making
8
men prostate
8

Similar Publications

We intended to investigate the potential of several transitional zone (TZ) volume-related variables for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among lesions scored as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3. Between September 2018 and August 2023, patients who underwent mpMRI examination and scored as PI-RADS 3 were queried from our institution. The diagnostic performances of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), TZ-adjusted PSAD (TZPSAD), and TZ-ratio (TZ volume/whole gland prostate volume) were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In NCCN favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP), we tested the effect of upstaging and upgrading on cancer-specific mortality (CSM).

Methods: Within the SEER database (2010-2021), upstaging (≥pT3a or pN1) and upgrading (ISUP ≥3) rates in FIR RP patients were tabulated. Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots and multivariable Cox-regression models (CRMs) were fitted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dosimetric comparison of CyberKnife and conventional linac prostate SBRT plans: analysis of the PACE-B Study.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

January 2025

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.

Purpose: In the PACE-B study, a non-randomised comparison of toxicity outcomes between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) platforms revealed fewer urinary side-effects with CyberKnife (CK) compared to conventional linac (CL) SBRT. This analysis compares baseline characteristics and planning dosimetry between the CK-SBRT and CL-SBRT cohorts in PACE-B, aiming to provide insight into possible reasons for differing toxicity outcomes between the platforms.

Methods: Dosimetric parameters for the surrogate urethra (SU), contoured urethra, bladder, bladder trigone (BT), and rectum were extracted from available CT planning scans of PACE-B SBRT patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor of the male reproductive system. In this study, we establish an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) line from a male diagnosed with PC. of This iPSCs line was generated from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using a non-integrated Sendai virus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!