A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Enhanced Recovery Care vs. Traditional Care in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

Background: Enhanced recovery care could alleviate surgical stress and accelerate the recovery rates of patients. Previous studies showed the benefits of enhanced recovery after surgery program in liver surgery, but the exact role in laparoscopic hepatectomy is still unclear.

Aim: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after a surgery program in laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Methods: The relative studies from a specific search of PUBMED, EMBASE, OVID, and Cochrane database from June 2008 to February 2022 were selected and included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcomes included length of hospital stay, duration to functional recovery, and overall postoperative complication rate. The secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, cost of hospitalization, readmission rate, Grade I complication rate, and Grade II-V complication rate.

Results: A total of six studies with 643 patients [enhanced recovery care ( = 274) vs. traditional care ( = 369)] were eligible for analysis. These comprised three randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies. Enhanced recovery care group was associated with decreased hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.83~-0.28, < 0.0001], shorter duration to functional recovery (SMD = -1.14, 95% CI = -1.92~-0.37, = 0.004), and lower cost of hospitalization Mean Difference (MD) = -1,539.62, 95% CI = -1992.85~-1086.39, < 0.00001). Moreover, a lower overall postoperative complication rate was observed in enhanced recovery care group [Risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.51~0.80, < 0.0001] as well as lower Grade II-V complication rate (RR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38~0.80, = 0.002), while there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (MD = -65.75, 95% CI = -158.47~26.97, = 0.16), operative time (MD = -5.44, 95% CI = -43.46~32.58, = 0.78), intraoperative blood transfusion rate [Odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.41~1.22, = 0.22], and Grade I complication rate (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.53~1.03, = 0.07).

Conclusion: Enhanced recovery care in laparoscopic hepatectomy should be recommended, because it is not only safe and effective, but also can accelerate the postoperative recovery and lighten the financial burden of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980421PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.850844DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enhanced recovery
28
recovery care
24
complication rate
20
laparoscopic hepatectomy
12
intraoperative blood
12
recovery
11
95%
9
care
8
traditional care
8
care laparoscopic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!