Background: The Society for Surgical Oncology's Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in favor of observation in this population. Recent analyses reveal that this has not been widely adopted. The purpose of this cost-effectiveness analysis is to compare the costs and benefits associated with observation or SLNB in women >70 years old with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative, operable breast cancer.

Methods: A decision tree with Markov modeling was created to compare treatment strategies using long-term follow-up data from clinical trials in this population. Costs were estimated from published literature and publicly available databases. Breast cancer-specific health-state utilities were derived from the literature and expert opinion. One-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. A structural sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the effect of functional status and anxiety from nonevaluation of the axilla on cost-effectiveness. Costs and benefits, measured in life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), were tabulated across 10, 15, and 20 years and compared using incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results: SLNB is not cost-effective from the payer or societal perspectives with ICERs of $138,374/LY and $131,900/LY, respectively. When QALYs were considered, SLNB provided fewer QALYs (SLNB, 10.33 QALYs; observation, 10.53 QALYs) at a higher cost (SLNB, $15,845; observation, $4020). Structural sensitivity analysis revealed that SLNB was cost-effective in certain patients with significant anxiety related to axillary observation (ICER, $39,417/QALY).

Conclusions: Routine SLNB in this population is not cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of SLNB, however, is dependent on individual patient factors, including functional status as well as patient preference.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964149PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34207DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

slnb
9
choosing wisely
8
wisely guidelines
8
axillary observation
8
years hormone
8
hormone receptor-positive
8
receptor-positive clinically
8
clinically node-negative
8
node-negative operable
8
operable breast
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The optimal method for axillary staging in patients with initially node-positive breast cancer after NACT remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center trial to investigate the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) combined with wire localized lymph node biopsy (WLNB) of the clip-marked node as an axillary staging technique in patients with node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled, 208 of whom were included in the analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction Current guidelines advocate for a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with invasive breast cancer with negative axillary ultrasonography. However, emerging evidence has contradicted this, and SLNB omission has been found to be non-inferior in selected low-risk breast cancers. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence of SLNB in screen-detected invasive breast cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Methemoglobinemia is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition in which hemoglobin is oxidized, impairing the oxygen-carrying capacity. While congenital forms exist, acquired methemoglobinemia can occur in perioperative settings, especially following exposure to oxidizing agents such as dyes used in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Patent Blue V, a synthetic aniline dye commonly used for SLNB, has been associated with rare but serious adverse effects, including methemoglobinemia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

With the widespread use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the optimal management strategy for axillary lymph nodes following chemotherapy has become a hot topic of discussion. For patients with clinically positive axillary lymph nodes (cN +) (defined as axillary lymph nodes confirmed positive by pathology before NAC), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the current standard treatment. However, there is still no consensus on whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and other local axillary treatments following NAC can safely replace ALND to reduce injury and complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Clinicopathologic data-based sentinel lymph node (SLN) prediction models are used to select patients with melanoma for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, the temporal performance of these models is unknown. Therefore, we investigated whether the performance and clinical utility of the Melanoma Institute of Australia, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Friedman et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!