Purpose: The Acrysof Cachet® angle-supported phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) is designed to correct high refractive errors in human eyes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of AcrySof Cachet® angle-supported pIOL implantation with particular regard to efficacy and safety of the implant over a 60-month follow-up period.

Design: Retrospective consecutive clinical case study.

Methods: Prior to pIOL implantation, patients had a complete ophthalmologic examination including objective and subjective refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), endothelial cells density (ECD), slit lamp photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), Scheimpflug digital videokeratoscopy, optical biometry, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, and pupillometry. Postoperatively, patients received yearly a complete eye examination.

Results: Thirty-one eyes of 16 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 36.2 ± 8.1 years. UCVA (logMAR) improved from 1.33 ± 0.20 before surgery to 0.08 ± 0.14 one year after surgery and was 0.20 ± 0.20 five years after surgery. CDVA (logMAR) improved from 0.10 ± 0.10 before surgery to 0.05 ± 0.13 one year after surgery and was 0.04 ± 0.14 five years postoperatively. The mean percentage of endothelial cells loss (ECL) was 11.51% over the first year and 15.95% five years after surgery. There were no intraoperative complications in any of the eyes.

Conclusions: Our results up to five years after implantation of the AcrySof Cachet® angle-supported pIOL demonstrated very good outcomes in all above shown measurements, including CDVA, UCVA, and ECD. However, since major endothelial cell loss may occur in some patients with this type of pIOL, regular follow-up visits are required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8976641PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5362020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acrysof cachet®
16
cachet® angle-supported
16
angle-supported phakic
8
phakic intraocular
8
intraocular lens
8
angle-supported piol
8
piol implantation
8
visual acuity
8
endothelial cells
8
slit lamp
8

Similar Publications

Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation comprise a standard procedure for cataract treatment. However, minimal refractive error remains a determinant of postoperative results. Our study aimed to evaluate the refractive outcomes and the impact of the surgeon's experience and the IOL model on Kosovan and Hungarian patients after cataract surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of the SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II (BUII), Kane, and EVO intraocular lens (IOL) formulas for normal and long axial length (AL) groups using an ARGOS (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), which uses the specific refractive indices. We performed a review of patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery with the implantation of an Acrysof IQ SN60WF IOL (Alcon, Inc.) between January 2020 and December 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess the visual quality, patient satisfaction, and photic phenomena 3 and 12 months after the implantation of two similar diffractive intraocular lenses (IOLs) manufactured with different materials.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients with the AcrySof PanOptix IOL or the Clareon Pan-Optix IOL (both Alcon Laboratories, Inc). Three and 12 months after the surgery, binocular contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions was measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess visual outcomes and stability of lens alignment more than 3 years after implanting either the AT Lisa Tri Toric (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) intraocular lens (IOL).

Methods: Patients who had received either the AT Lisa Tri Toric or the Acrysof IQ Restor Toric IOL were included in the study. The average follow-up period was 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparing an Advanced Monofocal With a Non-diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Using a Mini-Monovision Approach.

Am J Ophthalmol

October 2024

From the Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), A Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.. Electronic address:

Purpose: To compare interindividual differences in visual performance of an advanced monofocal with a nondiffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens (IOL) using a mini-monovision approach.

Design: Single-center, randomized, controlled, double-masked study.

Methods: In total, 48 patients (96 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!