Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec amplification as a mechanism for ceftobiprole resistance in clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Clin Microbiol Infect

Department of Infectious Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology and Bioinformatics of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China; Regional Medical Center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. Electronic address:

Published: August 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • * Most MRSA isolates were susceptible to BPR, with significant differences in susceptibility based on strain type and SCCmec classification, where certain types showed higher susceptibility.
  • * The study identified potential genetic mutations in BPR-resistant isolates and highlighted nanopore sequencing as a valuable tool for uncovering resistance mechanisms in MRSA, raising concerns about the emergence of resistant strains.

Article Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the ceftobiprole (BPR) susceptibilities of 472 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, and investigated the mechanisms underlying BPR resistance.

Methods: For all MRSA isolates, BPR MIC was determined by agar dilution. We sequenced the BPR-resistant isolates through Illumina short- and MinION long-read sequencing. We also selected MRSA isolates of ST5, ST59, and ST239, and exposed them to increasing BRP concentrations. The isolated mutants developing BPR resistance were sequenced.

Results: A total of 471 MRSA isolates were susceptible to BPR, with MICs ranging from 0.25 to 2 mg/L. Compared with HA-MRSA isolates (MIC = 2 mg/L; MIC = 2 mg/L), CA-MRSA isolates (MIC = 0.5; MIC = 2 mg/L) were more susceptible to BPR (p < 0.001). Compared with isolates with staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type II or III (MIC = 2 mg/L; MIC = 2 mg/L), isolates with SCCmec type IV (MIC = 1 mg/L; MIC = 1 mg/L) or V (MIC = 0.5 mg/L; MIC = 1 mg/L) were more susceptible to BPR (p < 0.001). Nanopore sequencing revealed two copies of SCCmec repeats in the BPR-resistant MRSA isolate. In addition, SCCmec amplification could be induced by BPR exposure in ST239 MRSA isolates; however, no amplification was observed in the other lineages. The induced BPR-resistant MRSA isolates also acquired mutations in mecA and other genes, such as guaA, guaB, relA, rpoA, and oatA, which were speculated as factors contributing to BPR-resistance development.

Discussion: BPR showed significant antibacterial activity against MRSA isolates in China; however, the emergence of a BPR-resistant isolate before its launch was a cause for concern. Multiple genes and pathways are potentially involved in the development of BPR resistance in MRSA, and our data demonstrated the role of nanopore-sequencing in revealing the tandem repeat-mediated resistance mechanism in MRSA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.03.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mrsa isolates
16
mic = 2 mg/l
12
methicillin-resistant staphylococcus
8
staphylococcus aureus
8
isolates
8
susceptible bpr
8
bpr
6
staphylococcal cassette
4
cassette chromosome
4
chromosome mec
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!