The Impact of Orthodontic Retainers on Gingival Recession: A Best-Evidence Review.

Compend Contin Educ Dent

Associate Professor, Director, Graduate Periodontology Clinic, Assistant Director, Advanced Education in Periodontology,Department of Periodontology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, Alabama.

Published: March 2022

Retention is a critical phase of orthodontic therapy and aims to maintain occlusal stability and avoid crowding relapse. This best-evidence article reviews the effects of the different types of orthodontic retention appliances, fixed and removable, on the development and progression of gingival recession at the mandibular anterior teeth. Searched databases included PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Dentistry and Oral Sciences. Eleven qualifying publications, including retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies, were included in this review. These studies either did not demonstrate an association between orthodontic retainers and gingival recession or reported that the resulting recession defects were minimal when an association was shown. An important consideration is that recession could be a late finding following the placement of a retainer and, therefore, may be incipient or absent in short-term evaluations. Prospective studies that specifically address the role that properly positioned fixed retainers may have on gingival recession are needed before a definitive conclusion can be generalized with regard to recommended retention protocols. Factors such as duration of retainer use, number of bonded teeth, and position of fixed retainers relative to their proximity to gingival tissues are not fully elucidated but may have influencing roles on gingival recession. The use of retainers should be based on orthodontic indications to maintain a stable dental arch form, esthetics, and occlusion. Effective oral hygiene and follow-up regimens remain the gold standard in maintaining periodontal health and preventing gingival recession.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gingival recession
24
retainers gingival
12
orthodontic retainers
8
recession
8
fixed retainers
8
gingival
7
retainers
5
impact orthodontic
4
recession best-evidence
4
best-evidence review
4

Similar Publications

Background: For a periodontist, treating recession is always a proud moment and a challenging task. The current trial aimed at comparing and clinically evaluating semilunar coronally repositioned flap (SCRF) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedures combined with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in the management of Miller's Class I recession defects.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-six recession sites were randomly divided into the CAF or SCRF groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oral squamous cell papilloma is a benign proliferation of the stratified squamous epithelium, associated with the human papillomavirus (HPV). The clinical manifestation includes papillary or verrucous exophytic mass. Complete excision of the lesion, including normal margins, followed by histopathological examination is the treatment of choice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Comparative assessment of the effectiveness of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and the envelope technique with SCTG in Miller's Class I recession utilizing soft tissue-cone-beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT) and root coverage esthetic score (RES).

Materials And Methods: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to Group I (CAF + SCTG) and Group II (envelope technique + SCTG) using the coin toss method, with 10 patients in each group. Recession height (RH) and width (RW), probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and keratinized tissue height (HKT) were assessed at baseline and 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of autologous platelet concentrate (APCs) in comparison with coronally-advanced flap alone or in combination with connective tissue graft or other biomaterials or bioactive agents for root coverage (RC) of Miller's Class I and II gingival recession defects by measuring the keratinized mucosa width (KMW).

Materials And Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. An electronic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, Magiran, Scientific Information Database, and Irandoc for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that used APCs for RC in their intervention group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gingival recession (GR) has a multifactorial etiology, resulting from the interaction of various factors. It affects aesthetics and comfort, and has negative consequences for quality of life. The main objective of this study is to investigate the prevalence of gingival recession in a sample of the population in northern Portugal, according to the classification system proposed by Cairo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!