Classifying the difficulty levels of working memory tasks by using pupillary response.

PeerJ

Unidad Zacatecas, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, A.C., Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Mexico.

Published: January 2023

Knowing the difficulty of a given task is crucial for improving the learning outcomes. This paper studies the difficulty level classification of memorization tasks from pupillary response data. Developing a difficulty level classifier from pupil size features is challenging because of the inter-subject variability of pupil responses. Eye-tracking data used in this study was collected while students solved different memorization tasks divided as low-, medium-, and high-level. Statistical analysis shows that values of pupillometric features (as peak dilation, pupil diameter change, and suchlike) differ significantly for different difficulty levels. We used a wrapper method to select the pupillometric features that work the best for the most common classifiers; Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF). Despite the statistical difference, experiments showed that a random forest classifier trained with five features obtained the best F1-score (82%). This result is essential because it describes a method to evaluate the cognitive load of a subject performing a task using only pupil size features.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973468PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12864DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

difficulty levels
8
tasks pupillary
8
pupillary response
8
difficulty level
8
memorization tasks
8
pupil size
8
size features
8
pupillometric features
8
random forest
8
features
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!