AI Article Synopsis

  • Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is associated with serious infections in newborns, but its impact on maternal health has not been extensively studied.
  • A study involving 1,746 women found that 25.9% were GBS colonized at delivery, and GBS colonization doubled the risk of maternal peripartum infection compared to non-colonized women.
  • The findings suggest that GBS colonization may increase maternal infection risk, though it's unclear if this is due to direct infection or an overall increased susceptibility to infections.

Article Abstract

Background: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a major cause of serious neonatal infection but its role in maternal morbidity has received little investigation. The aim of this study was to determine whether GBS colonization at delivery is associated with increased risk of maternal peripartum infection.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 1746 unselected women had a vaginal-rectal culture taken at the onset of labor. Diagnosis of maternal peripartum infection was based on a combination of two or more signs or symptoms including fever, breast pain, severe wound or pelvic pain, purulent discharge and abnormal laboratory tests including C-reactive protein and white blood cell count occurring from labor until 2 weeks postpartum. The main outcome measure was the proportion of women with maternal peripartum infection according to GBS colonization status.

Results: A total of 25.9% (452/1746) women were colonized with GBS. The rate of peripartum infection was almost twice as high in colonized women (49/452 [10.8%]) vs. non-colonized women (81/1294 [6.3%]); OR 1.82 [1.26-2.64], p = 0.002). This association was confirmed in a multivariable model (OR 1.99 [1.35-2.95], p = 0.001). Women diagnosed with peripartum infection had a significantly longer hospital stay compared to women without peripartum infection (4 days (median) vs. 3 days, p < 0.001). Length of hospital stay did not differ between colonized and non-colonized women. Serotype IV GBS was more frequent in colonized women with peripartum infection than in women without peripartum infection (29.3% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: GBS colonization at delivery is associated with increased risk of peripartum infection. Whether this increase is due directly to invasion by GBS or whether GBS colonization is associated with a more general vulnerability to infection remains to be determined.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8975154PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0264309PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peripartum infection
36
maternal peripartum
16
gbs colonization
16
colonization delivery
12
delivery associated
12
women peripartum
12
infection
11
peripartum
10
women
10
group streptococcus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!