AI Article Synopsis

  • The text examines the impact of changing cannabis policies on alcohol use and related outcomes in the U.S. and Canada, as previous reviews showed mixed results on this relationship.
  • A review of studies from 2015 to 2020 identified 23 relevant papers, but findings on the link between cannabis policy liberalization and alcohol use were inconsistent, with some studies showing decreases in alcohol use but no effect on cannabis use itself.
  • The authors highlight limitations in the current research and propose that future studies enhance the classification of cannabis policies, consider the broader alcohol policy context, and verify how these changes actually affect cannabis use.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The liberalization of cannabis policies has the potential to affect the use of other substances and the harms from using them, particularly alcohol. Although a previous review of this literature found conflicting results regarding the relationship between cannabis policy and alcohol-related outcomes, cannabis policies have continued to evolve rapidly in the years since that review.

Search Methods: The authors conducted a narrative review of studies published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, that assessed the effects of cannabis policies on the use of alcohol in the United States or Canada.

Search Results: The initial search identified 3,446 unique monographs. Of these, 23 met all inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and five captured simultaneous or concurrent use of alcohol and cannabis.

Discussion And Conclusions: Associations between cannabis policy liberalization and alcohol use, alcohol-related outcomes, and the co-use of alcohol and cannabis were inconclusive, with studies finding positive associations, no associations, and negative associations. Although several studies found that cannabis policy liberalization was associated with decreases in alcohol use measures, these same studies showed no impact of the cannabis policy on cannabis use itself. The lack of a consistent association was robust to subject age, outcome measure (e.g., use, medical utilization, driving), and type of cannabis policy; however, this may be due to the small number of studies for each type of outcome. This paper discusses several notable limitations of the evidence base and offers suggestions for improving consistency and comparability of research going forward, including a stronger classification of cannabis policy, inclusion of measures of the alcohol policy environment, verification of the impact of cannabis policy on cannabis use, and consideration of mediation effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8936161PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v42.1.06DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cannabis policy
32
cannabis
14
policy liberalization
12
cannabis policies
12
policy
9
alcohol
8
liberalization alcohol
8
narrative review
8
alcohol-related outcomes
8
impact cannabis
8

Similar Publications

Importance: States have implemented multiple policies likely to influence opioid prescribing; few national general population studies examine those policies' effects on per-capita opioid morphine milligram equivalents (MME) dispensed.

Objective: To examine state policies' effects on opioids per-capita MMEs dispensed at retail pharmacies.

Design: A longitudinal study of associations between MME per capita and implementation of policy interventions at different times across states.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The increasing shift from cannabis smoking to cannabis vaping is largely driven by the perception that vaping to form an aerosol represents a safer alternative to smoking and is a form of consumption appealing to youth. Herein, we compared the chemical composition and receptor-mediated activity of cannabis smoke extract (CaSE) to cannabis vaping extract (CaVE) along with the biological response in human bronchial epithelial cells. Chemical analysis using HPLC and GC/MS revealed that cannabis vaping aerosol contained fewer toxicants than smoke; CaSE and CaVE contained teratogens, carcinogens, and respiratory toxicants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Emerging trends in cannabis administration for women with chronic pain.

Mental Health Sci

December 2024

School of Psychology, Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

Cannabis use among women who experience chronic pain is on the rise in the United States. However, little is known about women's motives and preferences for cannabis administration. The purpose of this study was to characterize cannabis use among women with chronic pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: To establish the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) used across different forms of cannabis, and to assess the predictive validity of THC estimates for predicting acute cannabis-related consequences.

Design: 14-day EMA using a smartphone application to assess cannabis use in real time.

Setting: Canada.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Based on the socio-ecological model of health, socioeconomic policy is an important determinant of population health. Spending decisions by public health units (PHU) have been shown to be associated with population health outcomes. Some studies have found greater PHU spending to be associated with improved population health, while others report mixed findings, warranting further research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!