Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) regulates immune homeostasis by promoting T-cell exhaustion. It is involved in chronic infections and tumor progression. Nuclear imaging using radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies can monitor PD-L1 tissue expression and antibody distribution. However, physiological PD-L1 can cause rapid antibody clearance from blood at imaging doses. Therefore, we hypothesized that inflammatory responses, which can induce PD-L1 expression, affect anti-PD-L1 antibody distribution. Here, we investigated the effects of three different infectious stimuli on the pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting of radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies in tumor-bearing mice.
Materials/methods: Anti-mouse-PD-L1 and isotype control antibodies were labelled with indium-111 ([In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 and [In]In-DTPA-IgG2a, respectively). We evaluated the effect of inflammatory responses on the pharmacokinetics of [In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 in RenCa tumor-bearing BALB/c mice in three conditions: lipopolysaccharide (LPS), local , and heat-killed . After intravenous injection of 30 or 100 µg of [In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 or [In]In-DTPA-IgG2a, blood samples were collected 1, 4, and 24 h p.i. followed by microSPECT/CT and biodistribution analyses. PD-L1 expression, neutrophil, and macrophage infiltration in relevant tissues were evaluated immunohistochemically.
Results: In 30 µg of [In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 injected tumor-bearing mice the LPS-challenge significantly increased lymphoid organ uptake compared with vehicle controls (spleen: 49.9 ± 4.4%ID/g versus 21.2 ± 6.9%ID/g, p < 0.001), resulting in lower blood levels (3.6 ± 1.6%ID/g versus 11.5 ± 7.2%ID/g; p < 0.01) and reduced tumor targeting (8.1 ± 4.5%ID/g versus 25.2 ± 5.2%ID/g, p < 0.001). Local infections showed high PD-L1 neutrophil influx resulting in significantly increased [In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 uptake in affected muscles (8.6 ± 2.6%ID/g versus 1.7 ± 0.8%ID/g, p < 0.001). Heat-killed (Hk-) challenge did not affect pharmacokinetics. Increasing [In]In-DTPA-anti-mPD-L1 dose to 100 µg normalized blood clearance and tumor uptake in LPS-challenged mice, although lymphoid organ uptake remained higher. Infectious stimuli did not affect [In]In-DTPA-IgG2a pharmacokinetics.
Conclusions: This study shows that anti-PD-L1 antibody pharmacokinetics and tumor targeting can be significantly altered by severe inflammatory responses, which can be compensated for by increasing the tracer dose. This has implications for developing clinical PD-L1 imaging protocols in onco-immunology. We further demonstrate that radiolabeled anti-PD-L1 antibodies can be used to evaluate PD-L1 expression changes in a range of infectious diseases. This supports the exploration of using these techniques to assess hosts' responses to infectious stimuli.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960984 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.837370 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!