Data resources for evaluating the economic and financial consequences of surgical care in the United States.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Department of Surgery (J.W.S., E.J.O.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Morehouse School of Medicine (P.A.-C.), Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Surgery (E.L.W.L.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; University of Maryland School of Medicine (B.R.B.), Baltimore, Maryland; Division of General Surgery, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (K.A.D.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery (A.G., K.S.), Rutgers, Brunswick, New Jersey; Department of Surgery, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (L.M.K., C.L.), Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wake Forest School of Medicine (R.S.M., S.W.R.), Winston-Salem; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (S.W.R.), Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina; Division of Acute Care Surgery (M.W.), McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Red Duke Trauma Institute at Memorial Hermann Hospital (M.W.), Texas Medical Center, Houston; and Department of Surgery (J.P.M.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Published: July 2022

Abstract: Evaluating the relationship between health care costs and quality is paramount in the current health care economic climate, as an understanding of value is needed to drive policy decisions. While many policy analyses are focused on the larger health care system, there is a pressing need for surgically focused economic analyses. Surgical care is costly, and innovative technology is constantly introduced into the operating room, and surgical care impacts patients' short- and long-term physical and economic well-being. Unfortunately, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the relationship between cost, value, and economic impact of surgical interventions. Despite the plethora of health care data available in the forms of claims databases, discharge databases, and national surveys, no single source of data contains all the information needed for every policy-relevant analysis of surgical care. For this reason, it is important to understand which data are available and what can be accomplished with each of the data sets. In this article, we provide an overview of databases commonly used in surgical health services research. We focus our review on the following five categories of data: governmental claims databases, commercial claims databases, hospital-based clinical databases, state and national discharge databases, and national surveys. For each, we present a summary of the database sampling frame, clinically relevant variables, variables relevant to economic analyses, strengths, weaknesses, and examples of surgically relevant analyses. This review is intended to improve understanding of the current landscape of data available, as well as stimulate novel analyses among surgical populations. Ongoing debates over national health policy reforms may shape the delivery of surgical care for decades to come. Appropriate use of available data resources can improve our understanding of the economic impact of surgical care on our health care system and our patients.

Level Of Evidence: Regular Review, Level V.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003631DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical care
24
health care
20
claims databases
12
care
11
surgical
9
data
8
data resources
8
care system
8
economic analyses
8
analyses surgical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!