Unlabelled: Whistleblowers have significantly shaped the state of contemporary society; in this context, this research sheds light on a persistently neglected research area: what are the key determinants of whistleblowing within government agencies? Taking a unique methodological approach, we combine evidence from two pieces of fieldwork, conducted using both primary and secondary data from the US and Indonesia. In Study 1, we use a large-scale survey conducted by the US Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). Additional tests are conducted in Study 1, making comparisons between those who have and those who do not have whistleblowing experience. In Study 2, we replicate the survey conducted by the MSPB, using empirical data collected in Indonesia. We find a mixture of corroboration of previous results and unexpected findings between the two samples (US and Indonesia). The most relevant result is that perceived organizational protection has a significant positive effect on whistleblowing intention in the US sample, but a similar result was not found in the Indonesian sample. We argue that this difference is potentially due to the weakness of whistleblowing protection in Indonesia, which opens avenues for further understanding the role of societal cultures in protecting whistleblowers around the globe.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10551-022-05089-y.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8949648PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05089-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

survey conducted
8
whistleblower? multi-country
4
multi-country field
4
study
4
field study
4
study determinants
4
determinants intention
4
intention report
4
report wrongdoing
4
wrongdoing unlabelled
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!