Agreement between 2 SS-OCT biometry devices.

J Cataract Refract Surg

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (McLintock, Seo); Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (McLintock); Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia (Niyazmand); Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (Barrett); Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (Barrett); Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (Barrett); Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia (Nilagiri); Department of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (McKelvie).

Published: October 2022

Purpose: To assess the agreement between 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry devices, Anterion and IOLMaster 700.

Setting: Tertiary referral center, Brisbane, Australia.

Design: Prospective comparative study.

Methods: Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between devices for flat (K1), steep (K2), and mean (Km) keratometry for anterior, posterior, and total cornea, lens thickness (LT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), white to white (WTW), and axial length (AL). Generalized estimating equations were used to control for within-patient between-eye correlations. Interdevice differences were considered clinically significant if they were likely to alter the spherical refractive outcome by 0.25 diopter (D) or more.

Results: 159 eyes of 91 patients (41 male, 50 female) were included. Statistically significant differences were found for K1, K2, and Km for anterior, posterior, and total cornea. When the Anterion was compared with the IOLMaster 700, the mean differences were as follows: anterior K1: -0.17 D, anterior K2: -0.18 D, anterior Km: -0.17 D, posterior K1: -0.38 D, posterior K2: -0.36 D, posterior Km: -0.37 D, total K1: -0.65 D, total K2: -0.82 D, and total Km: -0.74 D. The difference in posterior and total K metrics was clinically significant. Statistically significant differences were noted for LT: 0.159 mm, CCT: -0.004 mm, ACD: 0.054 mm, and WTW: -0.152 mm, although these were not found to be clinically significant. There was no significant difference between devices for AL.

Conclusions: This study found statistically and clinically significant differences for both posterior and total keratometry between the Anterion and the IOLMaster 700. Posterior and total corneal parameters cannot be considered interchangeable between devices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000942DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

posterior total
20
biometry devices
8
assess agreement
8
anterion iolmaster
8
posterior
8
anterior posterior
8
total
8
total cornea
8
statistically differences
8
differences anterior
8

Similar Publications

Background This study hypothesizes that patients with femoral condylar hypoplasia who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may experience femoral component malrotation and that the surgeon performing the operation may not notice it. The aim is to measure the rotational alignment of the femoral components and assess the functional outcomes in these patients. Materials and methods Between December 2018 and December 2022, a total of 96 knees from 80 patients were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Subsuperior Segment Segmentectomy.

Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep

December 2024

Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou, China.

The subsuperior segment (S∗), as an atypical pulmonary segment, is located between the superior and posterior basal segments. Many thoracic surgeons have no experience with anatomical segmental resection of S∗. We present a case of the posterior approach of left S∗ segmentectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Currently, there is a ‌paucity of research‌ comparing the clinical characteristics and repositioning efficacy between ‌posterior canal-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo-canalolithiasis (PC-BPPV-ca)‌ and ‌posterior canal-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo-cupulolithiasis (PC-BPPV-cu)‌.

Aims/objectives: To observe the clinical characteristics and compare the efficacy of repositioning maneuvers between PC-BPPV-ca and PC-BPPV-cu patients.

Material And Methods: Clinical information of patients was collected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Local relapse has not been eradicated even in the era of total mesorectum excision. Although various approaches have been attempted, R0 resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 45-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection was diagnosed with pelvic recurrence 7 months ago.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Currently, the direct endonasal approach is widely used in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for pituitary neuroendocrine tumor. However, a large posterior septal perforation is inevitable. We routinely utilize a modified para/transseptal approach using the combination of a Killian and a contralateral rescue flap incision (PTSA with K-R incision).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!